From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756806Ab2HNTWK (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:22:10 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]:44225 "EHLO mail-yw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755777Ab2HNTWI (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:22:08 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:22:03 -0700 From: Tejun Heo To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] timer: clean up initializers and implement irqsafe timers Message-ID: <20120814192203.GY25632@google.com> References: <1344449428-24962-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20120813233520.GG25632@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:16:16PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Why the hell are you trying to rush stuff which affects a well > maintained part of the kernel through your own tree w/o having the > courtesy of contacting the maintainer politely instead of sending an > ultimatum? > > You posted that series less than a week ago and there is no reason why > you need to push hard on inclusion into next after a few days. So, it has been out for a while, and it's not the final inclusion into mainline. The change to timer is fairly localized and you have enough opportunity to object before and after. It's not like I'm gonna push it in against oppositions. > If you really cared about my opinion you could have figured out that > I'm on vacation. Ah... sorry but it's not like we date or anything. Thanks. -- tejun