From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Aurelien Jacquiot <a-jacquiot@ti.com>,
linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] select GENERIC_ATOMIC64 for c6x/score/unicore32 archs
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:12:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120815141233.GA32389@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345038181.2750.20.camel@deneb.redhat.com>
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 09:42:58AM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 10:36 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > -#define L1_CACHE_BYTES L2_CACHE_BYTES
> > > +#define L1_CACHE_SHIFT L2_CACHE_SHIFT
> > > +#define L1_CACHE_BYTES (1 << L2_CACHE_SHIFT)
> >
> > Nitpick: the last line could better be:
> >
> > +#define L1_CACHE_BYTES (1 << L1_CACHE_SHIFT)
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
>
> Yes, I noticed that after sending the patch.
>
> Should I push this through the c6x tree?
That'd be good. For consistency, will you also include the
GENERIC_ATOMIC64 chunk in the titled patch?
I can send Andrew an updated series (reducing the c6x changes, and
possibly the score/unicore32 bits) later on.
Thanks,
Fengguang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-15 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-14 15:34 [PATCH] select GENERIC_ATOMIC64 for c6x/score/unicore32 archs Fengguang Wu
2012-08-14 16:22 ` Mark Salter
2012-08-15 2:30 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-15 2:36 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-15 13:42 ` Mark Salter
2012-08-15 14:12 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2012-08-15 14:19 ` Mark Salter
2012-08-15 5:42 ` guanxuetao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120815141233.GA32389@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=a-jacquiot@ti.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn \
--cc=lennox.wu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).