From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: lockdep warning on rt_mutex_lock()
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 22:02:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120817140240.GB539@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120817134328.GB2872@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 06:43:28AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 06:06:35PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > FYI, a lockdep warning:
>
> Certainly looks problematic!
>
> Any hint as to what version of the kernel produced this splat?
> (Yes, lazy of me to ask, I know, but I am not seeing it in my testing.)
It happens on both 3.5.0 and 3.6-rc1. Will bisect (try older kernels) help?
Bisect is handy for me :)
Sorry the back trace in the original email only happens in _one_ test box.
That makes it hard to reproduce..
The more common test boxes see these traces (with different config).
I'll send full config/dmesg for the first one in another email.
[ 24.647556] init: Temporary process spawn error: No such file or directory
[ 24.806072] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 24.807042] WARNING: at /c/kernel-tests/src/linux/kernel/lockdep.c:3493 check_flags+0x113/0x2a7()
[ 24.807042] Hardware name: Bochs
[ 24.807042] Pid: 8, comm: rcu_kthread Not tainted 3.6.0-rc1-00011-gf8cdda8 #2
[ 24.807042] Call Trace:
[ 24.807042] [<ffffffff81089d10>] ? up+0x50/0x5c
[ 24.807042] [<ffffffff8105cc87>] warn_slowpath_common+0xb3/0xe1
[ 24.807042] [<ffffffff8105cdb7>] warn_slowpath_null+0x23/0x2c
[ 24.807042] [<ffffffff810aabdb>] check_flags+0x113/0x2a7
[ 24.807042] [<ffffffff810ac9f9>] lock_is_held+0x4b/0xe4
[ 24.807042] [<ffffffff810918fd>] __might_sleep+0x4e/0x277
[ 24.807042] [<ffffffff8199fa1d>] rt_mutex_lock+0x23/0x54
[ 24.807042] [<ffffffff810d9c89>] rcu_boost+0xeb/0x140
[ 24.807042] [<ffffffff819a06e7>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x78/0xeb
[ 24.807042] [<ffffffff81082a0c>] ? spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x10/0x19
[ 24.807042] [<ffffffff81082d75>] ? finish_wait+0x8f/0x9f
[ 24.807042] [<ffffffff810da3fc>] rcu_kthread+0xf2/0x1f0
[ 24.807042] [<ffffffff81082e3c>] ? abort_exclusive_wait+0xb7/0xb7
[ 24.807042] [<ffffffff810da30a>] ? __rcu_process_callbacks+0x1b4/0x1b4
[ 24.807042] [<ffffffff81082032>] kthread+0x95/0xa4
[ 24.807042] [<ffffffff819a33c4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[ 24.807042] [<ffffffff819a1bb0>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
[ 24.807042] [<ffffffff81081f9d>] ? freezing+0x2c/0x2c
[ 24.807042] [<ffffffff819a33c0>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
[ 22.951027] [sched_delayed] sched: RT throttling activated
[ 34.752102] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 34.753023] WARNING: at /c/kernel-tests/src/tip/kernel/lockdep.c:3493 check_flags+0xc1/0x1d0()
[ 34.753023] Pid: 6, comm: rcu_kthread Not tainted 3.5.0-03701-g899852a #1
[ 34.753023] Call Trace:
[ 34.753023] [<ffffffff8107a311>] ? check_flags+0xc1/0x1d0
[ 34.753023] [<ffffffff8103a906>] warn_slowpath_common+0x66/0x90
[ 34.753023] [<ffffffff8103aa05>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x20
[ 34.753023] [<ffffffff8107a311>] check_flags+0xc1/0x1d0
[ 34.753023] [<ffffffff8107d983>] lock_acquire+0x63/0xe0
[ 34.753023] [<ffffffff810688f6>] ? update_curr_rt+0xd6/0x190
[ 34.753023] [<ffffffff8164963b>] _raw_spin_lock+0x3b/0x50
[ 34.753023] [<ffffffff81648cf8>] ? rt_mutex_slowlock+0x38/0x150
[ 34.753023] [<ffffffff81648cf8>] rt_mutex_slowlock+0x38/0x150
[ 34.753023] [<ffffffff81266d58>] ? __raw_spin_lock_init+0x38/0x70
[ 34.753023] [<ffffffff81648e38>] rt_mutex_lock+0x28/0x30
[ 34.753023] [<ffffffff8109b1e6>] rcu_boost+0x76/0xf0
[ 34.753023] [<ffffffff8109b405>] rcu_kthread+0xa5/0x140
[ 34.753023] [<ffffffff8105a160>] ? abort_exclusive_wait+0xa0/0xa0
[ 34.753023] [<ffffffff8109b360>] ? __rcu_process_callbacks+0x100/0x100
[ 34.753023] [<ffffffff8105964d>] kthread+0x8d/0xa0
[ 34.753023] [<ffffffff8164ba04>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[ 34.753023] [<ffffffff8164a330>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
[ 34.753023] [<ffffffff810595c0>] ? kthread_flush_work_fn+0x10/0x10
[ 34.753023] [<ffffffff8164ba00>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
[ 11.635806] HugeTLB registered 4 MB page size, pre-allocated 0 pages
[ 12.105729] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 12.105729] WARNING: at /c/kernel-tests/src/i386/kernel/lockdep.c:3493 check_flags+0xaa/0x190()
[ 12.105729] Hardware name: Bochs
[ 12.105729] Pid: 6, comm: rcu_kthread Not tainted 3.5.0-rc5+ #30
[ 12.105729] Call Trace:
[ 12.105729] [<c102773a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7a/0xa0
[ 12.105729] [<c10646ca>] ? check_flags+0xaa/0x190
[ 12.105729] [<c10646ca>] ? check_flags+0xaa/0x190
[ 12.105729] [<c10277fd>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
[ 12.105729] [<c10646ca>] check_flags+0xaa/0x190
[ 12.105729] [<c1067b3c>] lock_acquire+0x3c/0xb0
[ 12.105729] [<c1007668>] ? sched_clock+0x8/0x10
[ 12.105729] [<c104ecf5>] ? sched_clock_local.constprop.2+0x15/0x150
[ 12.105729] [<c14c9a20>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x70
[ 12.105729] [<c14c9296>] ? rt_mutex_slowlock+0x26/0x130
[ 12.105729] [<c14c9296>] rt_mutex_slowlock+0x26/0x130
[ 12.105729] [<c1068837>] ? debug_check_no_locks_freed+0x127/0x160
[ 12.105729] [<c1062f9d>] ? put_lock_stats.isra.19+0xd/0x30
[ 12.105729] [<c14c93b9>] rt_mutex_lock+0x19/0x20
[ 12.105729] [<c107eeac>] rcu_kthread+0x10c/0x1c0
[ 12.105729] [<c14c8cff>] ? preempt_schedule+0x2f/0x50
[ 12.105729] [<c104d169>] ? complete+0x49/0x60
[ 12.105729] [<c107eda0>] ? __rcu_process_callbacks+0x110/0x110
[ 12.105729] [<c1042cc7>] kthread+0x67/0x70
[ 12.105729] [<c1042c60>] ? kthread_flush_work_fn+0x10/0x10
[ 12.105729] [<c14cb33a>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0xd
Thanks,
Fengguang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-17 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-17 10:06 lockdep warning on rt_mutex_lock() Fengguang Wu
2012-08-17 13:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-17 14:02 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2012-08-17 14:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-18 4:59 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-21 19:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-22 1:03 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-17 14:07 ` Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120817140240.GB539@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).