From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755685Ab2HTHuo (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Aug 2012 03:50:44 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:65484 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755620Ab2HTHun (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Aug 2012 03:50:43 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:50:39 +0200 From: Thierry Reding To: "Kim, Milo" Cc: Bryan Wu , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds-lm3530: replace pwm platform functions with generic pwm functions Message-ID: <20120820075038.GA20443@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de> References: <201208200537.48993.arnd@arndb.de> <20120820055817.GA17149@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de> <20120820073141.GA27645@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5vNYLRcllDrimb99" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:Oxtj5JYYc9ewzYRtnzRYtTBvdLQFusfYpGgpFe0HkT/ allF9eAVP6qb9mC60578CA+xNrxTViES5SsJBj10IvqUE9RqrR 02f8GFwiNRLttdIxGebUi3y3JNL45wZkpt89Gs/z8VRVxfHFgw YNv5Uj6k6VBwLxVMBo01a3h0td8cNgvYZKe8bN/kjV5zg9nXd7 PHZ/mUuOua8WqR0uyErfiI4+VBtKrKPtqJlHd6bnPYdYE7A5gn ITpezlpWVV/MFFehskFxBpZrWFF5ZK9F59BMGs9A8gDuOij10t 0fd3fDnFKcQ/u8H+ZoWDpceCtqSPLlSjUSHr4fsheuVE5bGFUZ 0t5c/9JDkFa99CiJ8iyOg0VFQue7nmVIWoXACSfnC/xYejHWl0 rKP6MD+UjMSGwIOUJOkVCMB0jtCGIvFSgA= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 07:41:31AM +0000, Kim, Milo wrote: > > Maybe we should get this resolved somehow in the meantime. Resolving > > the > > other issues may take another cycle or two, so you may not want to wait > > that long. >=20 > Is that job also including HAVE_PWM configurations? > Some SoCs still set HAVE_PWMs and codes exist under arch/ directory. > As I far as understand, new PWM subsystem uses CONFIG_PWM not HAVE_PWM, r= ight? > And then will HAVE_PWM be cleaned-up? Yes, the goal is to remove all implementations of the old framework (HAVE_PWM) and replace it with PWM only implementations. I suppose we could in the meantime add #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_PWM around the legacy functions and provide dummies in the !PWM case. That might work. Thierry --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQMexOAAoJEN0jrNd/PrOh/HUQAINn1M1HXqNDcdGm+zS6hNNb aFy0bCvo0M+SfAo7XOIu8JUAtmvWZqWf14Tzq6lNXYgs9K56UF8RqqcK20XIaM43 YJtFjLDSHcQkmymKUYqQvfmDDxwgJAgTbN2E0a/p2Yoo9PvCJkG8DEgh1+oTI8X/ aroMLX8nIDw7K00Iaf2NcQVwGAdCSQkNmVzgsSdpZ+ukzikCzJ+naqjgtGDlEzIE sv/7AFlB3L1/oJjIdOgrb80QjZxOnxFk+uRROarpI7hROqQ01GqwmmV9Yswa8bv6 4hdKhThntEIX1YifxYWnZm983n4gu/rHKamwnOkbZaf9FSfAyleBL55HA8IRQfgo hUb9tANEXGnwIUE7YATSdtmPLuPwR9Cu11ksN2P8S0reu3xS+5pMrFCxRAmpXZOY QL6FRulSse6Xsin2KCJ7M+Darc6HSH7JKbW0fY1upbbD+RbXZ8bcBb9BFkAmPaRQ RMrJ8YVjR9CkniQvrJxq43YniHnsIGQHksI3WqjgORlaOkXR6SZLPfu826JEkUHW s2jW/VCISdOR2zWFAnC0AhqeLAjiuRLx237iS7RozmoJm4x+evXo9TS/bU883bdL 6swi0WGCcYFk05qfanG9Js+uSfIfcQNQDOY1ux3h1LOQgmYTfRNw2BWze1autPjo Ur9A5YpEZV0GljhyNcY3 =+BXK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5vNYLRcllDrimb99--