From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756766Ab2HTOtn (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:49:43 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:44536 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754308Ab2HTOtl (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:49:41 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 07:49:37 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Rene Buergel Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3]: ezusb cleanup, FX2 support, firmware downloading support Message-ID: <20120820144937.GB27266@kroah.com> References: <20120815222055.GA22907@kroah.com> <7ea0bc18-451f-4025-885b-5071b82e8769@shmail0> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <7ea0bc18-451f-4025-885b-5071b82e8769@shmail0> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:52:56AM +0200, Rene Buergel wrote: > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > > On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 05:06:27PM +0200, René Bürgel wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > this is a patches-series for controllers using the ezusb-functions. > > > > > > ezusb: remove dependency to usb_serial interface > > > euzsb: add support for Cypress FX2LP > > > ezusb: add functions for firmware download > > > > Nice series, but your patches are white-space damaged, and I can't > > apply > > them at all. > > > > Also, your third patch has the wrong Subject: line > > > > Care to resend them in a format that I can apply them in? > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > > Thanks for reviewing it. > > I will check my email-settings and resend the patches. > > I'm sorry about the wrong Subject line, this will be corrected when resending. > > I got some further questions: > - Although i removed the dependency from ezusb to usb_serial, > ezusb.c still resides in drivers/usb/serial. > Can you give me a hint, where to put it instead? > I would like to do that with an additional patch. Why do you want to move it? > - is it fine to base the soon-to-be-resent patches on 3.6-rc2? You should redo them against the linux-next tree, which has many more patches than 3.6-rc2. greg k-h