[PATCH] power_supply: Remove broken mark for da9052-battery

[PATCH] power_supply: Remove broken mark for da9052-battery

[Axel Lin]

The fix for MFD part is already merged so we can remove the broken mark
for da9052-battery.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/power/Kconfig |    1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/power/Kconfig b/drivers/power/Kconfig
index c1892f3..fcc1bb0 100644
--- a/drivers/power/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/power/Kconfig
@@ -167,7 +167,6 @@ config BATTERY_DA9030
 config BATTERY_DA9052
 	tristate "Dialog DA9052 Battery"
 	depends on PMIC_DA9052
-	depends on BROKEN
 	help
 	  Say Y here to enable support for batteries charger integrated into
 	  DA9052 PMIC.
-- 
1.7.9.5

Re: [PATCH] power_supply: Remove broken mark for da9052-battery

[Anton Vorontsov]

On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 04:08:18PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> The fix for MFD part is already merged so we can remove the broken mark
> for da9052-battery.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
> ---
[...]
> -	depends on BROKEN

Applied, thanks a lot!

Though, I had to apply the following right after:

commit bc909f27f55ceb8f950ced5cf3a26d6b26e86ca6
Author: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed Aug 22 19:29:44 2012 -0700

    da9052-battery: Fix da9052_determine_vc_tbl_index's return value
    
    The patch fixes the following warnings:
    
      CHECK   drivers/power/da9052-battery.c
    drivers/power/da9052-battery.c:330:15: warning: symbol 'da9052_determine_vc_tbl_index' was not declared. Should it be static?
      CC      drivers/power/da9052-battery.o
    drivers/power/da9052-battery.c: In function 'da9052_determine_vc_tbl_index':
    drivers/power/da9052-battery.c:348:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
    
    Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>

diff --git a/drivers/power/da9052-battery.c b/drivers/power/da9052-battery.c
index a5f6a0e..20b86ed 100644
--- a/drivers/power/da9052-battery.c
+++ b/drivers/power/da9052-battery.c
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static int da9052_bat_interpolate(int vbat_lower, int  vbat_upper,
 	return tmp;
 }
 
-unsigned char da9052_determine_vc_tbl_index(unsigned char adc_temp)
+static unsigned char da9052_determine_vc_tbl_index(unsigned char adc_temp)
 {
 	int i;
 
@@ -345,6 +345,13 @@ unsigned char da9052_determine_vc_tbl_index(unsigned char adc_temp)
 		     && (adc_temp <= vc_tbl_ref[i]))
 				return i + 1;
 	}
+	/*
+	 * For some reason authors of the driver didn't presume that we can
+	 * end up here. It might be OK, but might be not, no one knows for
+	 * sure. Go check your battery, is it on fire?
+	 */
+	WARN_ON(1);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int da9052_bat_read_capacity(struct da9052_battery *bat, int *capacity)