From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934033Ab2HWNsk (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:48:40 -0400 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:47503 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933649Ab2HWNsj (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:48:39 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:48:37 +0100 From: Matthew Garrett To: Sebastian Poehn Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] dell-laptop: Caused by "Remove rfkill code" commit Message-ID: <20120823134836.GA18857@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1345726401.1481.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20120823131458.GA18067@srcf.ucam.org> <1345729603.1503.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1345729603.1503.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@cavan.codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cavan.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 03:46:43PM +0200, Sebastian Poehn wrote: > On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 14:14 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 02:53:21PM +0200, Sebastian Pöhn wrote: > > > > > As rfkill can not get the state of the physical kill-switch, both state may differ. > > > > b43 should know the state of the physical rfkill switch even if there's > > no platform code to support it. > > > BCM 4313 is _only_ supported by BCMs proprietar driver and brcmsmac; and > the later one I use. Ok, well definitely seems like a bug in brcmsmac. > Further there should be problems with other Wifis, like Intel? Why? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org