From: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@macqel.be>
To: Stany MARCEL <stany.marcel@novasys-ingenierie.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add support to broadcom 5222 PHY
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:02:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120823160255.GA32671@frolo.macqel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+mBkFXnOB9hPoJVf6c92UuemqtLJwc2KW-G-ja6cG8VqLPZdw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 05:21:23PM +0200, Stany MARCEL wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Stany MARCEL
> > <stany.marcel@novasys-ingenierie.com> wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Stany MARCEL <stany.marcel@novasys-ingenierie.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> This driver is an adaption of the one given by freescale for kernel 2.6.25.
> >>
> >> Tested with kernel 3.4.8 with arch/m68k backported from linux-m68k head
> >> 2 FEC configured with shared phy
> >>
> >> drivers/net/phy/Kconfig | 7 +-
> >> drivers/net/phy/Makefile | 1 +
> >> drivers/net/phy/broadcom522x.c | 171 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> > This patch and "[PATCH 3/3] Add support to M54xx DMA FEC Driver" need to go
> > through the netdev tree, or collect acks there.
> >
> > Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> >
> > Geert
> >
>
> Hello Geert,
>
> Please, what is the good process to follow as patch 3 depends on patch 1 ?
Actually, IMHO patch 3 does not depend on patch 1, and I even think that
patch 1 is not needed, except to get a message with "BCM5222" instead
of "Generic PHY" in the kernel log.
AFAIK the phy interface is standardized.
Philippe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-23 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-21 12:18 [PATCH 1/3] Add support to broadcom 5222 PHY Stany MARCEL
2012-08-21 12:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] Add support to Freescale M54xx Multi Channel DMA engine Stany MARCEL
2012-08-21 12:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] Add support to M54xx DMA FEC Driver Stany MARCEL
2012-08-28 5:51 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-09-05 9:14 ` Philippe De Muyter
2012-09-05 10:48 ` RE : " Stany MARCEL
2012-09-05 11:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-08-23 10:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] Add support to broadcom 5222 PHY Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-08-23 12:34 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-08-23 15:25 ` Stany MARCEL
2012-08-23 15:21 ` Stany MARCEL
2012-08-23 15:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-08-23 16:02 ` Philippe De Muyter [this message]
2012-08-23 22:01 ` Stany MARCEL
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120823160255.GA32671@frolo.macqel \
--to=phdm@macqel.be \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stany.marcel@novasys-ingenierie.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox