From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@kernel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>, X86-ML <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Chao Wang <chaowang@redhat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86: Only direct map addresses that are marked as E820_RAM
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:12:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120823201224.GA24203@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50364E9E.6020104@zytor.com>
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 08:39:10AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 08/23/2012 07:50 AM, Jacob Shin wrote:
> >>
> >>I have one concern with this, which is that it leaves in place mapping
> >>below the initial max_pfn_mapped. Although that neatly resolves the
> >>legacy area (0-1 MiB) issues, it really isn't right above the 1 MiB
> >>point. Any way I could get you to seek out and unmap any such ranges?
> >>We have already seen some Dell machines which put memory holes in low
> >>RAM, and perhaps there are still some machines out there with an I/O
> >>hole at 15 MiB.
> >
> >So I believe in V2 of the patchset this was done, however, Dave Young
> >from redhat reported that it broke their KVM guest with a user supplied
> >memory map that looked like this:
> >
> >>>[ 0.000000] e820: user-defined physical RAM map:
> >>>[ 0.000000] user: [mem 0x0000000000010000-0x000000000009dbff] usable
> >>>[ 0.000000] user: [mem 0x0000000024000000-0x0000000033f6bfff] usable
> >
> >And looking into that scenario, the early boot code seems to allocates
> >space for fixmap right under initial max_pfn_mapped, which is no longer
> >direct mapped with my patch, and that seems to cause problems for later
> >APIC code that initializes APIC base address into the fixmap area.
> >
> >So I guess to address your concern, we need to go back to V2 and try to
> >resolve the fixmap problem with user supplied memory map that reserves
> >memory below initial max_pfn_mapped ?
> >
>
> Okay... I think I need to grok that a bit better. For memory
> allocations, we probably should just use brk allocations, for
> virtual space allocations it is called the fixmap for a reason (even
> though the Xen people managed to break that on 32 bits, sigh!)
Can you rope me in on that? Was that added ooh years ago ?
>
> I guess I need to go back and look at David's bug report...
>
> -hpa
>
>
> --
> H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
> I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-23 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-14 22:39 [PATCH V3 0/4] x86: Create direct mappings for E820_RAM only Jacob Shin
2012-08-14 22:39 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: Move enabling of PSE and PGE out of init_memory_mapping Jacob Shin
2012-08-14 22:39 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86: find_early_table_space based on memory ranges that are being mapped Jacob Shin
2012-08-14 22:39 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86: Only direct map addresses that are marked as E820_RAM Jacob Shin
2012-08-22 23:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-23 14:50 ` Jacob Shin
2012-08-23 15:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-23 20:12 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2012-08-23 21:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-23 22:35 ` Jacob Shin
2012-08-23 23:46 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-08-23 23:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-14 22:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86: Fixup code testing if a pfn is direct mapped Jacob Shin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120823201224.GA24203@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad@kernel.org \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=chaowang@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jacob.shin@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox