linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] revert changes to zcache_do_preload()
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:28:45 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120823232845.GE5369@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5036AA38.6010400@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 05:10:00PM -0500, Seth Jennings wrote:
> On 08/23/2012 03:56 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Hi Seth,
> > 
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:33:09AM -0500, Seth Jennings wrote:
> >> This patchset fixes a regression in 3.6 by reverting two dependent
> >> commits that made changes to zcache_do_preload().
> >>
> >> The commits undermine an assumption made by tmem_put() in
> >> the cleancache path that preemption is disabled.  This change
> >> introduces a race condition that can result in the wrong page
> >> being returned by tmem_get(), causing assorted errors (segfaults,
> >> apparent file corruption, etc) in userspace.
> >>
> >> The corruption was discussed in this thread:
> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/17/494
> > 
> > I think changelog isn't enough to explain what's the race.
> > Could you write it down in detail?
> 
> I didn't come upon this solution via code inspection, but
> rather through discovering that the issue didn't exist in
> v3.5 and just looking at the changes since then.

Okay, then, why do you think the patchsets are culprit?
I didn't look the cleanup patch series of Xiao at that time
so I can be wrong but as I just look through patch of
"zcache: optimize zcache_do_preload", I can't find any fault
because zcache_put_page checks irq_disable so we don't need
to disable preemption so it seems that patch is correct to me.
If the race happens by preemption, BUG_ON in zcache_put_page
should catch it.

What do you mean? Do you have any clue in your mind?

        The commits undermine an assumption made by tmem_put() in
        the cleancache path that preemption is disabled.

> 
> > And you should Cc'ed Xiao who is author of reverted patch.
> 
> Thanks for adding Xiao.  I meant to do this. For some reason
> I thought that you submitted that patchset :-/

Even, I didn't notice that patchset at that time. :)

> My bad.
> 
> Seth
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-23 23:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-23 15:33 [PATCH 0/2] revert changes to zcache_do_preload() Seth Jennings
2012-08-23 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "staging: zcache: cleanup zcache_do_preload and zcache_put_page" Seth Jennings
2012-08-23 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] Revert "staging: zcache: optimize zcache_do_preload" Seth Jennings
2012-08-23 20:56 ` [PATCH 0/2] revert changes to zcache_do_preload() Minchan Kim
2012-08-23 22:10   ` Seth Jennings
2012-08-23 23:28     ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2012-08-24  2:21       ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-24 20:57       ` Seth Jennings
2012-08-29 17:42         ` Seth Jennings

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120823232845.GE5369@bbox \
    --to=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    --cc=sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).