From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, dhowells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: lockdep trace from posix timers
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 20:56:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120824185619.GA16719@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120821183408.GA11721@redhat.com>
On 08/21, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > task_work_add(struct task_struct *task, struct callback_head *twork, bool notify)
> > {
> > do {
> > twork->next = ACCESS_ONCE(task->task_works);
> > if (unlikely(twork->next == TWORK_EXITED))
> > return -ESRCH;
> > } while (cmp_xchg(&task->task_works, twork->next, twork));
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> while (!cmp_xchg(...))
and _cancel can be simplified a bit.
OK, I actually tested the code below, seems to work.
Peter, if you think it can work for you and if you agree with
the implementation I will be happy to send the patch.
The only change outside of task_work.c is that exit_task_work()
should call task_work_run() unconditionally.
As for cmp_xchg below... Of course it is not strictly needed.
But otoh, personally I'd like to have this helper (probably
renamed) somewhere in include/linux. Perhaps this is just me,
but cmpxchg() always confuses me, and most users only need
success_or_not from cmpxchg.
Oleg.
#define cmp_xchg(ptr, _old, new) \
({ \
__typeof__(_old) old = (_old); \
cmpxchg(ptr, old, new) == old; \
})
#define TWORK_EXITED ((struct callback_head*)1)
int
task_work_add(struct task_struct *task, struct callback_head *work, bool notify)
{
do {
work->next = ACCESS_ONCE(task->task_works);
if (unlikely(work->next == TWORK_EXITED))
return -ESRCH;
} while (!cmp_xchg(&task->task_works, work->next, work));
/* test_and_set_bit() implies mb(), see tracehook_notify_resume(). */
if (notify)
set_notify_resume(task);
return 0;
}
struct callback_head *
task_work_cancel(struct task_struct *task, task_work_func_t func)
{
struct callback_head **pprev = &task->task_works;
struct callback_head *work = NULL;
unsigned long flags;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
if (likely(*pprev != TWORK_EXITED)) {
while ((work = *pprev)) {
read_barrier_depends();
if (work->func != func)
pprev = &work->next;
else if (cmp_xchg(pprev, work, work->next))
break;
}
}
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
return work;
}
void task_work_run(void)
{
struct task_struct *task = current;
struct callback_head *work, *head, *next;
for (;;) {
raw_spin_lock_irq(&task->pi_lock);
do {
work = ACCESS_ONCE(task->task_works);
head = !work && (task->flags & PF_EXITING) ?
TWORK_EXITED : NULL;
} while (!cmp_xchg(&task->task_works, work, head));
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&task->pi_lock);
if (!work)
break;
#if PETERZ_WONT_ARGUE_AGAINST_FIFO_TOO_MUCH
head = NULL;
do {
next = work->next;
work->next = head;
head = work;
work = next;
} while (work);
work = head;
#endif
do {
next = work->next;
work->func(work);
work = next;
cond_resched();
} while (work);
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-24 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-24 20:36 lockdep trace from posix timers Dave Jones
2012-07-27 16:20 ` Dave Jones
2012-08-16 12:54 ` Ming Lei
2012-08-16 14:03 ` Dave Jones
2012-08-16 18:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-17 15:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-17 15:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-17 16:40 ` task_work_add() should not succeed unconditionally (Was: lockdep trace from posix timers) Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-20 7:15 ` lockdep trace from posix timers Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 11:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 11:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 11:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 12:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-08-20 12:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 14:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-20 15:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 15:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 15:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-20 15:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 15:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-20 16:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 15:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-20 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 15:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-20 15:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 16:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-20 16:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 16:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-21 18:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-21 18:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-24 18:56 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-08-26 19:11 ` [PATCH 0/4] (Was: lockdep trace from posix timers) Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-26 19:12 ` [PATCH 1/4] task_work: make task_work_add() lockless Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-14 6:08 ` [tip:core/urgent] task_work: Make " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-24 19:27 ` [PATCH 1/4] task_work: make " Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-09-24 20:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-26 19:12 ` [PATCH 2/4] task_work: task_work_add() should not succeed after exit_task_work() Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-14 6:09 ` [tip:core/urgent] " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-26 19:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] task_work: revert d35abdb2 "hold task_lock around checks in keyctl" Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-14 6:10 ` [tip:core/urgent] task_work: Revert " hold " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-26 19:12 ` [PATCH 4/4] task_work: simplify the usage in ptrace_notify() and get_signal_to_deliver() Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-14 6:11 ` [tip:core/urgent] task_work: Simplify " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-06 18:01 ` [PATCH 0/4] (Was: lockdep trace from posix timers) Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-06 18:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-07 13:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-28 16:29 ` lockdep trace from posix timers Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-28 17:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-28 17:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-28 17:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-29 15:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-20 14:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-20 15:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-20 15:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 15:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120824185619.GA16719@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).