From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756604Ab2HZCB2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Aug 2012 22:01:28 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:65309 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754819Ab2HZCB0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Aug 2012 22:01:26 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,313,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="214001368" Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 19:01:23 -0700 From: Sarah Sharp To: Alex Shi Cc: gregkh , Alan stern , Felipe Balbi , linux-usb , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb/xhci: unify parameter of xhci_msi_irq Message-ID: <20120826020123.GG6557@xanatos> References: <1331787186.2979.71.camel@debian> <20120315145743.GA7928@kroah.com> <4F6204B7.5010908@intel.com> <20120315175608.GA6077@xanatos> <4FC5D04E.5040907@intel.com> <4FD59AD8.1050109@intel.com> <20120611204709.GC5742@xanatos> <20120611211428.GB24904@kroah.com> <502897A4.4030601@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <502897A4.4030601@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 01:59:00PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > On 06/12/2012 05:14 AM, gregkh wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 01:47:09PM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote: > >> Hi Alex, > >> > >> This got lost in the 3.5 push, but I think it's a good candidate for > >> 3.6. I think Greg is accepting 3.6 patches now, and I'll send this off > >> to him. > > > > Yes, I am taking 3.6 stuff now. In the future, once -rc1 is out, I can > > take patches for the next release at that point in time. > > > > greg k-h > > > > > Didn't find the patch in upstream 3.6-rc, but it is still workable for > upstream kernel. > So, was you just going to apply it on 3.7 kernel? or just forget it? Hi Alex, I am human, and trying my human best to keep up as a maintainer. Bug fixes and big features take priority over the small improvements, and I'm sorry that your patch (and other patches) have fallen by the wayside. It is not personal, I simply cannot be perfect. I will be returning to full maintainership duties after the various Linux conferences next week, and I will do my best to get your patch merged. Sarah Sharp