From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756698Ab2IDJUg (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Sep 2012 05:20:36 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:39491 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752722Ab2IDJUf (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Sep 2012 05:20:35 -0400 Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 11:20:20 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Roland Stigge Cc: Kevin Wells , "vitalywool@gmail.com" , "khali@linux-fr.org" , "ben-linux@fluff.org" , "grant.likely@secretlab.ca" , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Srinivas Bakki , "aletes.xgr@gmail.com" , "jonsmirl@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] i2c: pnx: Fix bit definitions Message-ID: <20120904092020.GA21271@pengutronix.de> References: <1344411752-23469-1-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de> <20120818095108.GB24812@pengutronix.de> <5030A81E.5090508@antcom.de> <083DF309106F364B939360100EC290F823A0354A3D@eu1rdcrdc1wx030.exi.nxp.com> <20120820175527.GA9169@pengutronix.de> <50451016.7010608@antcom.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50451016.7010608@antcom.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:21e:67ff:fe11:9c5c X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: wsa@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 10:16:22PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote: > Hi Wolfram, >=20 > On 20/08/12 19:55, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> I've never had my hands on a PNX4008 chip at NXP, but I do > >> believe they are the same IP. That specific I2C IP was used in a > >> number of NXP/Phillips chips besides the PNX4008/LPC32xx. I don't > >> think there are any PNX4008's in the wild, and even working in > >> NXP, I can't find any non-marketing reference material for that > >> part (including the user manual). > >=20 > > Thanks for the heads up. I'll apply both patches, then. >=20 > Should I consider the two patches as applied now (where? > i2c-embedded?), or should I resend? ;-) I will apply them these days and then let them stay in linux-next for a few days. So, I'd think they should go in for rc6. --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlBFx9QACgkQD27XaX1/VRtkagCeJFTChjISeMcjcJcfwwThIKIF nSQAmwSl2JaWlr0kFa3Kk5jVt6N5kQGQ =h8Ur -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV--