From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760077Ab2IFAOz (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2012 20:14:55 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]:40990 "EHLO mail-ie0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760011Ab2IFAOx (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2012 20:14:53 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:14:48 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Darren Hart Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Stable , Tomoya MORINAGA , Feng Tang , Alexander Stein Subject: Re: [PATCH] pch_uart: Add eg20t_port lock field, avoid recursive spinlocks Message-ID: <20120906001448.GA7278@kroah.com> References: <422aa2054659680fb138d2153dcc852b2620b04d.1346889148.git.dvhart@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <422aa2054659680fb138d2153dcc852b2620b04d.1346889148.git.dvhart@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 05:04:07PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > The following patch has been included in linux-next > (fe89def79c48e2149abdd1e816523e69a9067191) but has not yet landed in mainline > nor been queued for stable so far as I can determine. This patch addresses a > deadlock in mainline and is a prerequisite for an additional fix required by the > PREEMPT_RT kernel. Can we get this pulled into 3.4.11 please? 3.4.11? It has to hit Linus's tree first. > Perhaps I am > jumping the gun, but this patch was originally pulled on June 19, 2012. Remember, we missed a pull cycle for tty due to other problems, I thought I picked all of the different pieces needed for 3.6, but I must of missed this one. Should it go there now? Also, if you want a patch in the stable tree, please tell me when you submit it by marking it with a cc: stable in the signed-off-by area of the patch. thanks, greg k-h