linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, dhowells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] (Was: lockdep trace from posix timers)
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 20:01:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120906180100.GA9479@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120826191132.GA3743@redhat.com>

Ping...

Al, will you agree with these changes?

Peter, do you think you can do your make-it-lockless patch (hehe, I
think this is not possible ;) on top?

On 08/26, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 08/24, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > Peter, if you think it can work for you and if you agree with
> > the implementation I will be happy to send the patch.
>
> I think I should try anyway ;)
>
> To simplify the review, I attached the resulting code below.
>
> Changes:
>
> 	- Comments.
>
> 	- Not sure this is really better, but task_work_run()
> 	  does not need to actually take pi_lock, unlock_wait
> 	  is enough.
>
> 	  However, in this case the dummy entry is better than
> 	  the fake pointer.
>
> Oleg.
>
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/task_work.h>
> #include <linux/tracehook.h>
>
> static struct callback_head work_exited; /* all we need is ->next == NULL */
>
> int
> task_work_add(struct task_struct *task, struct callback_head *work, bool notify)
> {
> 	struct callback_head *head;
>
> 	do {
> 		head = ACCESS_ONCE(task->task_works);
> 		if (unlikely(head == &work_exited))
> 			return -ESRCH;
> 		work->next = head;
> 	} while (cmpxchg(&task->task_works, head, work) != head);
>
> 	if (notify)
> 		set_notify_resume(task);
> 	return 0;
> }
>
> struct callback_head *
> task_work_cancel(struct task_struct *task, task_work_func_t func)
> {
> 	struct callback_head **pprev = &task->task_works;
> 	struct callback_head *work = NULL;
> 	unsigned long flags;
> 	/*
> 	 * If cmpxchg() fails we continue without updating pprev.
> 	 * Either we raced with task_work_add() which added the
> 	 * new entry before this work, we will find it again. Or
> 	 * we raced with task_work_run(), *pprev == NULL/exited.
> 	 */
> 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
> 	while ((work = ACCESS_ONCE(*pprev))) {
> 		read_barrier_depends();
> 		if (work->func != func)
> 			pprev = &work->next;
> 		else if (cmpxchg(pprev, work, work->next) == work)
> 			break;
> 	}
> 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
>
> 	return work;
> }
>
> void task_work_run(void)
> {
> 	struct task_struct *task = current;
> 	struct callback_head *work, *head, *next;
>
> 	for (;;) {
> 		/*
> 		 * work->func() can do task_work_add(), do not set
> 		 * work_exited unless the list is empty.
> 		 */
> 		do {
> 			work = ACCESS_ONCE(task->task_works);
> 			head = !work && (task->flags & PF_EXITING) ?
> 				&work_exited : NULL;
> 		} while (cmpxchg(&task->task_works, work, head) != work);
>
> 		if (!work)
> 			break;
> 		/*
> 		 * Synchronize with task_work_cancel(). It can't remove
> 		 * the first entry == work, cmpxchg(task_works) should
> 		 * fail, but it can play with *work and other entries.
> 		 */
> 		raw_spin_unlock_wait(&task->pi_lock);
> 		smp_mb();
>
> 		/* Reverse the list to run the works in fifo order */
> 		head = NULL;
> 		do {
> 			next = work->next;
> 			work->next = head;
> 			head = work;
> 			work = next;
> 		} while (work);
>
> 		work = head;
> 		do {
> 			next = work->next;
> 			work->func(work);
> 			work = next;
> 			cond_resched();
> 		} while (work);
> 	}
> }


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-06 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-24 20:36 lockdep trace from posix timers Dave Jones
2012-07-27 16:20 ` Dave Jones
2012-08-16 12:54   ` Ming Lei
2012-08-16 14:03     ` Dave Jones
2012-08-16 18:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-17 15:14   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-17 15:17     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-17 16:40       ` task_work_add() should not succeed unconditionally (Was: lockdep trace from posix timers) Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-20  7:15     ` lockdep trace from posix timers Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 11:44       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 11:46         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 11:50         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 12:19           ` Steven Rostedt
2012-08-20 12:20             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 14:59         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-20 15:10           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 15:27             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 15:32               ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-20 15:46                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 15:58                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-20 16:03                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 15:05         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-20 15:12           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 15:41             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-20 15:56               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 16:10                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-20 16:19                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 16:23                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-21 18:27                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-21 18:34                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-24 18:56                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-26 19:11                             ` [PATCH 0/4] (Was: lockdep trace from posix timers) Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-26 19:12                               ` [PATCH 1/4] task_work: make task_work_add() lockless Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-14  6:08                                 ` [tip:core/urgent] task_work: Make " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-24 19:27                                 ` [PATCH 1/4] task_work: make " Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-09-24 20:37                                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-26 19:12                               ` [PATCH 2/4] task_work: task_work_add() should not succeed after exit_task_work() Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-14  6:09                                 ` [tip:core/urgent] " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-26 19:12                               ` [PATCH 3/4] task_work: revert d35abdb2 "hold task_lock around checks in keyctl" Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-14  6:10                                 ` [tip:core/urgent] task_work: Revert " hold " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-26 19:12                               ` [PATCH 4/4] task_work: simplify the usage in ptrace_notify() and get_signal_to_deliver() Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-14  6:11                                 ` [tip:core/urgent] task_work: Simplify " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-06 18:01                               ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-09-06 18:35                                 ` [PATCH 0/4] (Was: lockdep trace from posix timers) Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-07 13:13                                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-28 16:29                             ` lockdep trace from posix timers Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-28 17:01                               ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-28 17:12                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-28 17:28                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-29 15:25                                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-20 14:55       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-20 15:43       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-20 15:48         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-20 15:58           ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120906180100.GA9479@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).