The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
To: T Makphaibulchoke <tmac@hp.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxram@us.ibm.com,
	paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kernel/resource.c: fix stack overflow in __reserve_region_with_split
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:44:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120910044421.GD2387@ram-ThinkPad-T61> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1347055699-3468-1-git-send-email-tmac@hp.com>

On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 04:08:19PM -0600, T Makphaibulchoke wrote:
> Using recurvise call to try adding a non-conflicting region in the function
> __reserve_region_with_split() could result in a stack overflow in the case
> that the recursive calls are too deep.  Convert the recursive calls to
> an iterative loop to avoid the problem.
> 
> Tested on a machine containing 135 regions.  The kernel no longer panicked
> with stack overflow.
> 
> Also tested with code arbitrarily adding regions with no conflict, embedding
> two consecutive conflicts and embedding two non-consecutive conflicts.
> 
> Signed-off-by: T Makphaibulchoke <tmac@hp.com>
> 
> ---
> Change since v2:
> * Initializing both the name and flags fileds of the newly allocated region
>   request.
> 
> Change since v1:
> * Fixing __resrve_region_with_split() to ensure a reqion reserve request is
>   satisfied to the fullest extent, minus any overlapping conflicting regions.
> ---
>  kernel/resource.c |   50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
> index 34d4588..73f35d4 100644
> --- a/kernel/resource.c
> +++ b/kernel/resource.c
> @@ -763,6 +763,7 @@ static void __init __reserve_region_with_split(struct resource *root,
>  	struct resource *parent = root;
>  	struct resource *conflict;
>  	struct resource *res = kzalloc(sizeof(*res), GFP_ATOMIC);
> +	struct resource *next_res = NULL;
> 
>  	if (!res)
>  		return;
> @@ -772,21 +773,46 @@ static void __init __reserve_region_with_split(struct resource *root,
>  	res->end = end;
>  	res->flags = IORESOURCE_BUSY;
> 
> -	conflict = __request_resource(parent, res);
> -	if (!conflict)
> -		return;
> +	while (1) {
> 
> -	/* failed, split and try again */
> -	kfree(res);
> +		conflict = __request_resource(parent, res);
> +		if (!conflict) {
> +			if (!next_res)
> +				break;
> +			res = next_res;
> +			next_res = NULL;
> +			continue;
> +		}
> 
> -	/* conflict covered whole area */
> -	if (conflict->start <= start && conflict->end >= end)
> -		return;
> +		/* conflict covered whole area */
> +		if (conflict->start <= res->start &&
> +				conflict->end >= res->end) {
> +			kfree(res);
> +			WARN_ON(next_res);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* failed, split and try again */
> +		if (conflict->start > res->start) {
> +			end = res->end;
> +			res->end = conflict->start - 1;
> +			if (conflict->end < end) {
> +				next_res = kzalloc(sizeof(*next_res),
> +						GFP_ATOMIC);
> +				if (!next_res) {
> +					kfree(res);
> +					break;
> +				}
> +				next_res->name = name;
> +				next_res->start = conflict->end + 1;
> +				next_res->end = end;
> +				next_res->flags = IORESOURCE_BUSY;
> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			res->start = conflict->end + 1;
> +		}
> +	}
> 
> -	if (conflict->start > start)
> -		__reserve_region_with_split(root, start, conflict->start-1, name);
> -	if (conflict->end < end)
> -		__reserve_region_with_split(root, conflict->end+1, end, name);
>  }
> 
>  void __init reserve_region_with_split(struct resource *root,

Reviewed-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>


      reply	other threads:[~2012-09-10  4:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-07 22:08 [PATCH v3] kernel/resource.c: fix stack overflow in __reserve_region_with_split T Makphaibulchoke
2012-09-10  4:44 ` Ram Pai [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120910044421.GD2387@ram-ThinkPad-T61 \
    --to=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=tmac@hp.com \
    --cc=weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox