From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dm-devel@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
bharrosh@panasas.com, david@fromorbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: Avoid deadlocks with bio allocation by stacking drivers
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:09:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120910220910.GB7677@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120910215633.GA19739@google.com>
Hello, Kent.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 02:56:33PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> commit df7e63cbffa3065fcc4ba2b9a93418d7c7312243
> Author: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
> Date: Mon Sep 10 14:33:46 2012 -0700
>
> block: Avoid deadlocks with bio allocation by stacking drivers
>
> Previously, if we ever try to allocate more than once from the same bio
> set while running under generic_make_request() (i.e. a stacking block
> driver), we risk deadlock.
>
> This is because of the code in generic_make_request() that converts
> recursion to iteration; any bios we submit won't actually be submitted
> (so they can complete and eventually be freed) until after we return -
> this means if we allocate a second bio, we're blocking the first one
> from ever being freed.
>
> Thus if enough threads call into a stacking block driver at the same
> time with bios that need multiple splits, and the bio_set's reserve gets
> used up, we deadlock.
>
> This can be worked around in the driver code - we could check if we're
> running under generic_make_request(), then mask out __GFP_WAIT when we
> go to allocate a bio, and if the allocation fails punt to workqueue and
> retry the allocation.
>
> But this is tricky and not a generic solution. This patch solves it for
> all users by inverting the previously described technique. We allocate a
> rescuer workqueue for each bio_set, and then in the allocation code if
> there are bios on current->bio_list we would be blocking, we punt them
> to the rescuer workqueue to be submitted.
>
> This guarantees forward progress for bio allocations under
> generic_make_request() provided each bio is submitted before allocating
> the next, and provided the bios are freed after they complete.
>
> Note that this doesn't do anything for allocation from other mempools.
> Instead of allocating per bio data structures from a mempool, code
> should use bio_set's front_pad.
>
> Tested it by forcing the rescue codepath to be taken (by disabling the
> first GFP_NOWAIT) attempt, and then ran it with bcache (which does a lot
> of arbitrary bio splitting) and verified that the rescuer was being
> invoked.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
> CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
I'm still a bit scared but think this is correct.
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
One last thing is that we may want to add @name on bioset creation so
that we can name the workqueue properly but that's for another patch.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-10 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-07 22:12 [PATCH 0/2] Avoid deadlocks with bio allocation Kent Overstreet
2012-09-07 22:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: Reorder struct bio_set Kent Overstreet
2012-09-07 22:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: Avoid deadlocks with bio allocation by stacking drivers Kent Overstreet
2012-09-08 19:36 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-10 0:28 ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-10 15:25 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-09-10 17:22 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-10 20:24 ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-10 20:40 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-10 21:33 ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-10 21:37 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-10 21:56 ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-10 22:09 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-09-10 22:50 ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2012-09-10 23:01 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-10 23:06 ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-10 23:09 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2012-09-10 23:35 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-10 23:45 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2012-09-10 23:01 ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-10 23:13 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-11 18:36 ` Muthu Kumar
2012-09-11 18:45 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-11 18:58 ` Muthu Kumar
2012-09-11 19:31 ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-11 20:00 ` Muthu Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120910220910.GB7677@google.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=koverstreet@google.com \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox