public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: "Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez" <siglesias@igalia.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	Jens Taprogge <jens.taprogge@taprogge.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	industrypack-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/20] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: provide new callbacks to tpci200
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:47:02 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120911084702.GM19396@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1347267118-9580-3-git-send-email-siglesias@igalia.com>


I had a few style comments on this patchset.  Nothing that couldn't
be fixed later.

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:51:41AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
> From: Jens Taprogge <jens.taprogge@taprogge.org>
> 
> Provide get_clockrate, set_clockrate, get_error, get_timeout and reset_timeout
> callbacks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jens Taprogge <jens.taprogge@taprogge.org>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c |  107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 107 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c b/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c
> index 4383953..861b00d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,20 @@
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include "tpci200.h"
>  
> +static u16 tpci200_status_timeout[] = {
> +	TPCI200_A_TIMEOUT,
> +	TPCI200_B_TIMEOUT,
> +	TPCI200_C_TIMEOUT,
> +	TPCI200_D_TIMEOUT,
> +};
> +
> +static u16 tpci200_status_error[] = {
> +	TPCI200_A_ERROR,
> +	TPCI200_B_ERROR,
> +	TPCI200_C_ERROR,
> +	TPCI200_D_ERROR,
> +};
> +
>  static struct ipack_bus_ops tpci200_bus_ops;
>  
>  static int tpci200_slot_unregister(struct ipack_device *dev);
> @@ -507,6 +521,94 @@ out_unlock:
>  	return res;
>  }
>  
> +static int tpci200_get_clockrate(struct ipack_device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct tpci200_board *tpci200 = check_slot(dev);
> +	__le16 __iomem *addr;

The point of the underscores in the __le16 is that you don't want to
pollute user space headers in glibc with a bunch of kernel typedefs.
It is not needed here.  (Or if it is, then we would need to replace
the u16 uses as well).

> +
> +	if (!tpci200)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	addr = &tpci200->info->interface_regs->control[dev->slot];
> +	return (ioread16(addr) & TPCI200_CLK32) ? 32 : 8;
> +}
> +
> +static int tpci200_set_clockrate(struct ipack_device *dev, int mherz)
> +{
> +	struct tpci200_board *tpci200 = check_slot(dev);
> +	__le16 __iomem *addr;
> +	u16 reg;
> +
> +	if (!tpci200)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	addr = &tpci200->info->interface_regs->control[dev->slot];
> +
> +	/* Ensure the control register is not changed by another task after we
> +	 * have read it. */
> +	mutex_lock(&tpci200->mutex);
> +	reg = ioread16(addr);
> +	switch (mherz) {
> +	case 8:
> +		reg &= ~(TPCI200_CLK32); break;
> +	case 32:
> +		reg |= TPCI200_CLK32; break;

Put the breaks on the next line so that we can see them.  At first I
thought it fell through.

> +	default:
> +		mutex_unlock(&tpci200->mutex);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +	iowrite16(reg, addr);
> +	mutex_unlock(&tpci200->mutex);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int tpci200_get_error(struct ipack_device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct tpci200_board *tpci200 = check_slot(dev);
> +	__le16 __iomem *addr;
> +	u16 mask;
> +
> +	if (!tpci200)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	addr = &tpci200->info->interface_regs->status;
> +	mask = tpci200_status_error[dev->slot];
> +	return (ioread16(addr) & mask) ? 1 : 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int tpci200_get_timeout(struct ipack_device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct tpci200_board *tpci200 = check_slot(dev);
> +	__le16 __iomem *addr;
> +	u16 mask;
> +
> +	if (!tpci200)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	addr = &tpci200->info->interface_regs->status;
> +	mask = tpci200_status_timeout[dev->slot];
> +
> +	return (ioread16(addr) & mask) ? 1 : 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int tpci200_reset_timeout(struct ipack_device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct tpci200_board *tpci200 = check_slot(dev);
> +	__le16 __iomem *addr;
> +	u16 mask;
> +
> +	if (!tpci200)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	addr = &tpci200->info->interface_regs->status;
> +	mask = tpci200_status_timeout[dev->slot];
> +
> +	iowrite16(mask, addr);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
> +

Only one blank line is here.

>  static void tpci200_uninstall(struct tpci200_board *tpci200)
>  {
>  	int i;
> @@ -524,6 +626,11 @@ static struct ipack_bus_ops tpci200_bus_ops = {
>  	.request_irq = tpci200_request_irq,
>  	.free_irq = tpci200_free_irq,
>  	.remove_device = tpci200_slot_unregister,
> +	.get_clockrate = tpci200_get_clockrate,
> +	.set_clockrate = tpci200_set_clockrate,
> +	.get_error     = tpci200_get_error,
> +	.get_timeout   = tpci200_get_timeout,
> +	.reset_timeout = tpci200_reset_timeout,
>  };
>  
>  static int tpci200_install(struct tpci200_board *tpci200)
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel@linuxdriverproject.org
> http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-11  8:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-10  8:51 [PATCH 01/20] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: Put the TPCI200 control registers into a struct Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10  8:51 ` [PATCH 02/20] Staging: ipack: Provide several carrier callbacks Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10  8:51 ` [PATCH 03/20] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: provide new callbacks to tpci200 Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-11  8:47   ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2012-09-12  9:28     ` Jens Taprogge
2012-09-12 11:13       ` Dan Carpenter
2012-09-12 11:21         ` Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-12 11:59           ` Dan Carpenter
2012-09-12 12:28             ` Jens Taprogge
2012-09-12 12:47               ` Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-12 11:58         ` Jens Taprogge
2012-09-10  8:51 ` [PATCH 04/20] Staging: ipack: Obtain supported speeds from ID ROM Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-11  8:47   ` Dan Carpenter
2012-09-10  8:51 ` [PATCH 05/20] Staging: ipack: Choose the optimum bus speed by default Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-11  8:47   ` Dan Carpenter
2012-09-10  8:51 ` [PATCH 06/20] Staging: ipack: remove field driver from struct ipack_device Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10  8:51 ` [PATCH 07/20] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: remove struct list_head Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10  8:51 ` [PATCH 08/20] Staging: ipack: Switch to 8MHz operation before reading ID Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-11  8:48   ` Dan Carpenter
2012-09-11 11:31     ` Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-11 11:39       ` Jens Taprogge
2012-09-11 14:39         ` Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-11 15:33           ` Dan Carpenter
2012-09-10  8:51 ` [PATCH 09/20] Staging: ipack: reset previous timeouts during device registration Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-11  8:48   ` Dan Carpenter
2012-09-10  8:51 ` [PATCH 10/20] Staging: ipack: check the device ID space CRC Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10  8:51 ` [PATCH 11/20] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: reorder the iounmap and pci_release_region Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-11  8:49   ` Dan Carpenter
2012-09-10  8:51 ` [PATCH 12/20] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: increment the reference counter of the pci_dev Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10  8:51 ` [PATCH 13/20] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: fix the uninstall the ipack device Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10  8:51 ` [PATCH 14/20] Staging: ipack/devices/ipoctal: change exiting procedure Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10  8:51 ` [PATCH 15/20] Staging: ipack/devices/ipoctal: free the IRQ Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10  8:51 ` [PATCH 16/20] Staging: ipack: unregister devices when uninstall the carrier device Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10  8:51 ` [PATCH 17/20] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: delete ipack_device_unregister calls when exiting Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10  8:51 ` [PATCH 18/20] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: remove tpci200_slot_unregister Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10  8:51 ` [PATCH 19/20] Staging: ipack: delete .remove_device() callback Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10  8:51 ` [PATCH 20/20] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: Store the irq holder in slot_irq Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-11  8:51   ` Dan Carpenter
2012-09-11  9:05     ` Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-11  9:57       ` Dan Carpenter
2012-09-10 18:29 ` [PATCH 01/20] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: Put the TPCI200 control registers into a struct Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-09-11  7:01   ` Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-11  7:42     ` Miguel Gómez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120911084702.GM19396@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=industrypack-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=jens.taprogge@taprogge.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=siglesias@igalia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox