From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: "Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez" <siglesias@igalia.com>
Cc: Jens Taprogge <jens.taprogge@taprogge.org>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
industrypack-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/20] Staging: ipack: Switch to 8MHz operation before reading ID.
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:33:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120911153349.GY19396@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1347374377.4539.115.camel@fourier.local.igalia.com>
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:39:37PM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 13:39 +0200, Jens Taprogge wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 01:31:06PM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 11:48 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:51:46AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
> > > > > From: Jens Taprogge <jens.taprogge@taprogge.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > Reading the ID space at 8 MHz is always supported. Most carriers will
> > > > > boot up in 8MHz mode. Still, play it safe and ensure we are operating at
> > > > > 8Mhz.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jens Taprogge <jens.taprogge@taprogge.org>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/staging/ipack/ipack.c | 11 ++++++++---
> > > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/ipack/ipack.c b/drivers/staging/ipack/ipack.c
> > > > > index 4f3c945..95f56b8 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/staging/ipack/ipack.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/ipack/ipack.c
> > > > > @@ -376,6 +376,9 @@ struct ipack_device *ipack_device_register(struct ipack_bus_device *bus,
> > > > > dev_set_name(&dev->dev,
> > > > > "ipack-dev.%u.%u", dev->bus_nr, dev->slot);
> > > > >
> > > > > + if (bus->ops->set_clockrate(dev, 8))
> > > > > + dev_warn(&dev->dev, "failed to switch to 8 MHz operation for reading of device ID.\n");
> > > > > +
> > > > > ret = ipack_device_read_id(dev);
> > > > > if (ret < 0) {
> > > > > dev_err(&dev->dev, "error reading device id section.\n");
> > > > > @@ -384,9 +387,11 @@ struct ipack_device *ipack_device_register(struct ipack_bus_device *bus,
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > /* if the device supports 32 MHz operation, use it. */
> > > > > - ret = bus->ops->set_clockrate(dev, dev->speed_32mhz ? 32 : 8);
> > > > > - if (ret < 0)
> > > > > - dev_err(&dev->dev, "failed to switch to 32 MHz operation.\n");
> > > > > + if (dev->speed_32mhz) {
> > > > > + ret = bus->ops->set_clockrate(dev, 32);
> > > > > + if (ret < 0)
> > > > > + dev_err(&dev->dev, "failed to switch to 32 MHz operation.\n");
> > > > > + }
> > > >
> > > > Ah. Well done. That's what I suggested earlier. I think you
> > > > should get rid of the ->speed_8mhz all together.
> > >
> > > I will do it in a follow-up patch. The rest of suggestions have been
> > > integrated in the patches. I will submit the patches very soon.
> >
> > I have not seen any IPack V2 device yet. But since the ID space
> > provides the 8MHz flag, it might be useful. On the other hand, we can
> > still readd it when we see it.
> >
>
> If we have the flag, we should use it in some point. Not only save it in
> the variable speed_8mhz and don't use it at all.
>
> > When you remove the flag, you can perhaps leave a comment in the code so
> > that it is easy to re-enable.
> >
>
> OK. I will send a patch in Industry Pack mailing list and we can discuss
> there if this is a good solution or not before sending to staging ML.
People worry too much about things they might need in the future.
This email thread is there on google. That's the first place people
will look for the information if we need it.
The rest of my inbox today is full of people (Aaro and Hartley)
removing write only variables that where we probed the hardware
for all kinds interesting stuff and don't use it.
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-11 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-10 8:51 [PATCH 01/20] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: Put the TPCI200 control registers into a struct Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10 8:51 ` [PATCH 02/20] Staging: ipack: Provide several carrier callbacks Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10 8:51 ` [PATCH 03/20] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: provide new callbacks to tpci200 Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-11 8:47 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-09-12 9:28 ` Jens Taprogge
2012-09-12 11:13 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-09-12 11:21 ` Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-12 11:59 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-09-12 12:28 ` Jens Taprogge
2012-09-12 12:47 ` Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-12 11:58 ` Jens Taprogge
2012-09-10 8:51 ` [PATCH 04/20] Staging: ipack: Obtain supported speeds from ID ROM Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-11 8:47 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-09-10 8:51 ` [PATCH 05/20] Staging: ipack: Choose the optimum bus speed by default Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-11 8:47 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-09-10 8:51 ` [PATCH 06/20] Staging: ipack: remove field driver from struct ipack_device Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10 8:51 ` [PATCH 07/20] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: remove struct list_head Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10 8:51 ` [PATCH 08/20] Staging: ipack: Switch to 8MHz operation before reading ID Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-11 8:48 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-09-11 11:31 ` Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-11 11:39 ` Jens Taprogge
2012-09-11 14:39 ` Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-11 15:33 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2012-09-10 8:51 ` [PATCH 09/20] Staging: ipack: reset previous timeouts during device registration Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-11 8:48 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-09-10 8:51 ` [PATCH 10/20] Staging: ipack: check the device ID space CRC Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10 8:51 ` [PATCH 11/20] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: reorder the iounmap and pci_release_region Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-11 8:49 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-09-10 8:51 ` [PATCH 12/20] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: increment the reference counter of the pci_dev Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10 8:51 ` [PATCH 13/20] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: fix the uninstall the ipack device Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10 8:51 ` [PATCH 14/20] Staging: ipack/devices/ipoctal: change exiting procedure Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10 8:51 ` [PATCH 15/20] Staging: ipack/devices/ipoctal: free the IRQ Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10 8:51 ` [PATCH 16/20] Staging: ipack: unregister devices when uninstall the carrier device Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10 8:51 ` [PATCH 17/20] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: delete ipack_device_unregister calls when exiting Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10 8:51 ` [PATCH 18/20] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: remove tpci200_slot_unregister Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10 8:51 ` [PATCH 19/20] Staging: ipack: delete .remove_device() callback Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-10 8:51 ` [PATCH 20/20] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: Store the irq holder in slot_irq Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-11 8:51 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-09-11 9:05 ` Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-11 9:57 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-09-10 18:29 ` [PATCH 01/20] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: Put the TPCI200 control registers into a struct Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-09-11 7:01 ` Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-11 7:42 ` Miguel Gómez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120911153349.GY19396@mwanda \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=industrypack-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jens.taprogge@taprogge.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=siglesias@igalia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox