public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: Josh Hunt <johunt@akamai.com>
Cc: "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] amd64_edac: Memory size reported double on processor family 0Fh
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:40:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120914154044.GD8789@aftab.osrc.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50534184.1050208@akamai.com>

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 09:39:00AM -0500, Josh Hunt wrote:
> On 09/14/2012 07:55 AM, Josh Hunt wrote:
> >
> >Thanks to your help I was able to test your branch, but it still does
> >not resolve the problem. Removal of the "factor=1" workaround fixes the
> >memory size reporting on boot, but the sysfs values are still incorrect.
> >
> 
> Please disregard what I said earlier about the shift still being
> wrong. Looking at the dmesg more I see now that the # of pages are
> correctly reported (262144), however sysfs is still wrong.
> 
> [   25.837588] EDAC DEBUG: init_csrows: MC node: 0, csrow: 0
> [   25.837589] EDAC DEBUG: amd64_csrow_nr_pages: csrow: 0, channel:
> 0, DBAM idx: 2
> [   25.837591] EDAC DEBUG: amd64_csrow_nr_pages: nr_pages/channel: 262144
> [   25.837592] EDAC amd64: CS0: Unbuffered DDR2 RAM
> [   25.837724] EDAC DEBUG: init_csrows: Total csrow0 pages: 262144
> [   25.837725] DBG: init_csrows: channel_count:2
> [   25.837856] DBG: init_csrows: channel_count:2
> [   25.837988] EDAC DEBUG: init_csrows: MC node: 0, csrow: 1
> [   25.837989] EDAC DEBUG: amd64_csrow_nr_pages: csrow: 1, channel:
> 0, DBAM idx: 2
> [   25.837991] EDAC DEBUG: amd64_csrow_nr_pages: nr_pages/channel: 262144
> [   25.837992] EDAC amd64: CS1: Unbuffered DDR2 RAM
> [   25.838157] EDAC DEBUG: init_csrows: Total csrow1 pages: 262144
> [   25.838158] DBG: init_csrows: channel_count:2
> [   25.838289] DBG: init_csrows: channel_count:2
> [   25.838421] EDAC DEBUG: init_csrows: MC node: 0, csrow: 2
> [   25.838422] EDAC DEBUG: amd64_csrow_nr_pages: csrow: 2, channel:
> 0, DBAM idx: 2
> [   25.838424] EDAC DEBUG: amd64_csrow_nr_pages: nr_pages/channel: 262144
> [   25.838425] EDAC amd64: CS2: Unbuffered DDR2 RAM
> [   25.838556] EDAC DEBUG: init_csrows: Total csrow2 pages: 262144
> [   25.838558] DBG: init_csrows: channel_count:2
> [   25.838689] DBG: init_csrows: channel_count:2
> [   25.838820] EDAC DEBUG: init_csrows: MC node: 0, csrow: 3
> [   25.838822] EDAC DEBUG: amd64_csrow_nr_pages: csrow: 3, channel:
> 0, DBAM idx: 2
> [   25.838823] EDAC DEBUG: amd64_csrow_nr_pages: nr_pages/channel: 262144
> [   25.838824] EDAC amd64: CS3: Unbuffered DDR2 RAM
> [   25.838957] EDAC DEBUG: init_csrows: Total csrow3 pages: 262144
> 
> I looked into this and see that sysfs is doing the double counting
> b/c it loops over the # of channels:
> 
> [  131.423949] DBG: csrow_size_show: i:0 nr_pages:262144 nr_channels:2
> [  131.424112] DBG: csrow_size_show: i:1 nr_pages:524288 nr_channels:2
> 
> I verified this in init_csrows:
> [   25.838958] DBG: init_csrows: channel_count:2
> 
> Since I don't know the details of the hardware here it's hard for me
> to suggest a fix, but it would seem that k8_early_channel_count()
> needs to be modified to only return 1 in this case?

Yeah, there are still some issues after the whole change to per-dimm
accounting came in. I'm looking into it.

Thanks for testing and reporting. If you see anything else out of the
ordinary, let me know too so that I can fix it.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-14 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1347403947-20187-1-git-send-email-johunt@akamai.com>
2012-09-11 23:02 ` [PATCH] amd64_edac: Memory size reported double on processor family 0Fh Josh Hunt
2012-09-12  8:51   ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-12 12:38     ` Josh Hunt
2012-09-12 12:52       ` Josh Hunt
2012-09-12 15:30         ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-12 15:37           ` Josh Hunt
2012-09-12 15:49             ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-12 16:23               ` Josh Hunt
2012-09-12 16:48                 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-12 16:58                   ` Josh Hunt
2012-09-12 17:06                     ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-12 17:23                       ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-14 12:55                         ` Josh Hunt
2012-09-14 14:39                           ` Josh Hunt
2012-09-14 15:40                             ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2012-09-21 12:36                             ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-21 13:02                               ` Josh Hunt
2012-09-21 14:01                                 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-21 14:54                                   ` Josh Hunt
2012-09-21 15:10                                     ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120914154044.GD8789@aftab.osrc.amd.com \
    --to=bp@amd64.org \
    --cc=johunt@akamai.com \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox