public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] uprobes: Fix UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP checks in handle_swbp()
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 19:15:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120914171557.GA29642@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120914171513.GA29599@redhat.com>

If handle_swbp()->add_utask() fails but UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP is set,
cleanup_ret: path do not restart the insn, this is wrong. Remove
this check and add the additional label for can_skip_sstep() = T
case.

Note also that UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP can be false positive, we simply
can not trust it unless arch_uprobe_skip_sstep() was already called.

Also, move another UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP check before can_skip_sstep()
into this helper, this looks more clean and understandable.

Note: probably we should rename "skip" to "emulate" and I think
that "clear UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP" should be moved to arch_can_skip.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/events/uprobes.c |   31 +++++++++++++++----------------
 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 9893cba..403d2e0 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1389,10 +1389,11 @@ bool uprobe_deny_signal(void)
  */
 static bool can_skip_sstep(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	if (arch_uprobe_skip_sstep(&uprobe->arch, regs))
-		return true;
-
-	uprobe->flags &= ~UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP;
+	if (uprobe->flags & UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP) {
+		if (arch_uprobe_skip_sstep(&uprobe->arch, regs))
+			return true;
+		uprobe->flags &= ~UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP;
+	}
 	return false;
 }
 
@@ -1494,12 +1495,12 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs)
 		utask = add_utask();
 		/* Cannot allocate; re-execute the instruction. */
 		if (!utask)
-			goto cleanup_ret;
+			goto restart;
 	}
 
 	handler_chain(uprobe, regs);
-	if (uprobe->flags & UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP && can_skip_sstep(uprobe, regs))
-		goto cleanup_ret;
+	if (can_skip_sstep(uprobe, regs))
+		goto out;
 
 	if (!pre_ssout(uprobe, regs, bp_vaddr)) {
 		arch_uprobe_enable_step(&uprobe->arch);
@@ -1508,15 +1509,13 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs)
 		return;
 	}
 
-cleanup_ret:
-	if (!(uprobe->flags & UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP))
-
-		/*
-		 * cannot singlestep; cannot skip instruction;
-		 * re-execute the instruction.
-		 */
-		instruction_pointer_set(regs, bp_vaddr);
-
+restart:
+	/*
+	 * cannot singlestep; cannot skip instruction;
+	 * re-execute the instruction.
+	 */
+	instruction_pointer_set(regs, bp_vaddr);
+out:
 	put_uprobe(uprobe);
 }
 
-- 
1.5.5.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-14 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-14 17:15 [PATCH 0/5] uprobes: handle_swbp() fixes Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-14 17:15 ` [PATCH 1/5] uprobes: Do not leak UTASK_BP_HIT if find_active_uprobe() fails Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-14 17:35   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-20 13:53   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-14 17:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] uprobes: Do not setup ->active_uprobe/state prematurely Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-20 13:55   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-14 17:15 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-09-15  7:39   ` [PATCH 3/5] uprobes: Fix UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP checks in handle_swbp() Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-09-15 15:01     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-17 17:20       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-18 16:07         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-20 14:43           ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-24 20:08             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-29 17:42               ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-20 14:05   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-14 17:16 ` [PATCH 4/5] uprobes: Kill UTASK_BP_HIT state Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-16 14:38   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-20 14:06   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-14 17:16 ` [PATCH 5/5] uprobes: Move clear_thread_flag(TIF_UPROBE) to uprobe_notify_resume() Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-20 14:06   ` Srikar Dronamraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120914171557.GA29642@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=anton@redhat.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox