From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756038Ab2ISAZE (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:25:04 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:38414 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754232Ab2ISAZA (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:25:00 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,446,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="223736707" Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 02:24:59 +0200 From: Samuel Ortiz To: Thierry Reding Cc: NeilBrown , Peter Ujfalusi , Benoit Cousson , Felipe Balbi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mfd: twl: Move PWM driver to PWM framework Message-ID: <20120919002459.GC3647@sortiz-mobl> References: <1347279020-15596-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@avionic-design.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1347279020-15596-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@avionic-design.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Thierry, On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 02:10:18PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > Hi, > > This mini series replaces the twl_has_*() macros by the equivalent > standard IS_ENABLED() macro and moves the PWM driver to the PWM > framework. > > I'll take the second patch through the PWM tree but would like to have > some Acked-bys from people that know and have the hardware and can > verify that I haven't broken anything. We're already going to have conflicts for twl-core.c as Tony is pushing some code for it through his tree. So, would you be ok with me carrying the whole series through the MFD tree ? Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/