From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756668Ab2ISQmm (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:42:42 -0400
Received: from na3sys009aog124.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.151]:58830 "EHLO
	na3sys009aog124.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751417Ab2ISQml convert rfc822-to-8bit
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:42:41 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
To: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>
From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@ti.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120919160251.GM28670@sortiz-mobl>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Philippe Begnic <philippe.begnic@st.com>,
        Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>,
        Michel Jaouen <michel.jaouen@stericsson.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
        Rickard Andersson <rickard.andersson@stericsson.com>
References: <1346415691-13371-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>
 <1346415691-13371-4-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>
 <20120919160251.GM28670@sortiz-mobl>
Message-ID: <20120919164231.17033.27762@nucleus>
User-Agent: alot/0.3.2+
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mfd: dbx500: Provide a more accurate smp_twd clock
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:42:31 -0700
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Quoting Samuel Ortiz (2012-09-19 09:02:51)
> Hi Ulf,
> 
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 02:21:30PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > From: Michel Jaouen <michel.jaouen@stericsson.com>
> > 
> > The local timer clock is based on ARM subsystem clock. This patch
> > obtains a more exact value of that clock by reading PRCMU registers.
> > Using this increases the accuracy of the local timer events.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Rickard Andersson <rickard.andersson@stericsson.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Michel Jaouen <michel.jaouen@stericsson.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c       |   42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/mfd/dbx500-prcmu-regs.h  |    4 +++-
> >  include/linux/mfd/dbx500-prcmu.h |    1 +
> >  3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c b/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c
> > index 4f74529..e7f9539 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c
> > @@ -418,6 +418,9 @@ static struct {
> >  
> >  static atomic_t ac_wake_req_state = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> >  
> > +/* Functions definition */
> > +static void compute_armss_rate(void);
> > +
> I'm not a big fan of forward declarations, but I still applied your patch to
> my for-next branch. Thanks.
> 

Samuel,

Not sure if you were Cc'd on the rest of the patches in this series but
after some discussion (see patch #1) I took all four patches into
clk-next, including the MFD change.  This was done first week of
September.  At this point those patches have shifted into my stable
branch that I have promised not to rebase (for arm-soc dependencies).

Are you OK with me taking this patch through the clk-next branch?

Regards,
Mike

> Cheers,
> Samuel.
> 
> -- 
> Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> http://oss.intel.com/