From: Tomoki Sekiyama <tomoki.sekiyama.qu@hitachi.com>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>,
yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Distinguish TLB shootdown interrupts from other functions call interrupts
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:50:33 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120920085033.14512.98190.stgit@hpxw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <505A6EFD.4070802@intel.com>
Hi Alex,
thank you for the review.
>> sum += irq_stats(cpu)->irq_call_count;
>> - sum += irq_stats(cpu)->irq_tlb_count;
>> + /* irq_tlb_count is already added to irq_call_count */
>
>redundant comments here?
>> @@ -98,6 +98,9 @@ static void flush_tlb_func(void *info)
>> {
>> struct flush_tlb_info *f = info;
>>
>> + /* irq_call_cnt is also incremented; be subtracted on display */
>
>If is it better to move above explanation to irq_call_cnt definition place: harirq.h?
Agreed.
In the patch below, I reduced the redundant comments.
--
As TLB shootdown requests to other CPU cores are now using function call
interrupts, TLB shootdowns entry in /proc/interrupts is always shown as 0.
This behavior change was introduced by commit 52aec3308db8 ("x86/tlb:
replace INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTOR by CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR").
This patch reverts TLB shootdowns entry in /proc/interrupts to count TLB
shootdowns separately from the other function call interrupts.
Signed-off-by: Tomoki Sekiyama <tomoki.sekiyama.qu@hitachi.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h | 2 ++
arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 4 ++--
arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 2 ++
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h
index d3895db..e34b252 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ typedef struct {
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
unsigned int irq_resched_count;
unsigned int irq_call_count;
+ /* irq_tlb_count is double-counted in irq_call_count, so it must be
+ subtracted from irq_call_count when displaying irq_call_count */
unsigned int irq_tlb_count;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_THERMAL_VECTOR
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
index d44f782..e4595f1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -92,7 +92,8 @@ int arch_show_interrupts(struct seq_file *p, int prec)
seq_printf(p, " Rescheduling interrupts\n");
seq_printf(p, "%*s: ", prec, "CAL");
for_each_online_cpu(j)
- seq_printf(p, "%10u ", irq_stats(j)->irq_call_count);
+ seq_printf(p, "%10u ", irq_stats(j)->irq_call_count -
+ irq_stats(j)->irq_tlb_count);
seq_printf(p, " Function call interrupts\n");
seq_printf(p, "%*s: ", prec, "TLB");
for_each_online_cpu(j)
@@ -147,7 +148,6 @@ u64 arch_irq_stat_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
sum += irq_stats(cpu)->irq_resched_count;
sum += irq_stats(cpu)->irq_call_count;
- sum += irq_stats(cpu)->irq_tlb_count;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_THERMAL_VECTOR
sum += irq_stats(cpu)->irq_thermal_count;
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 613cd83..2d6d8ed 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -98,6 +98,8 @@ static void flush_tlb_func(void *info)
{
struct flush_tlb_info *f = info;
+ inc_irq_stat(irq_tlb_count);
+
if (f->flush_mm != this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.active_mm))
return;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-20 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-19 9:04 [PATCH] x86: Distinguish TLB shootdown interrupts from other functions call interrupts Tomoki Sekiyama
2012-09-20 1:18 ` Alex Shi
2012-09-20 8:50 ` Tomoki Sekiyama [this message]
2012-09-21 8:08 ` Alex Shi
2012-09-24 1:37 ` Alex Shi
[not found] <50611D82.4010702@intel.com>
2012-09-26 2:11 ` Tomoki Sekiyama
2012-09-26 2:17 ` Alex Shi
2012-09-27 7:02 ` Alex Shi
2012-09-28 5:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-09-28 6:08 ` Alex Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120920085033.14512.98190.stgit@hpxw \
--to=tomoki.sekiyama.qu@hitachi.com \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).