From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
jlayton@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] audit: Use a tracepoint for getname
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:11:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120920151136.GD11325@ghostprotocols.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120920090545.465ca00d@redhat.com>
Em Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 09:05:45AM -0400, Eric Paris escreveu:
> cc'ing Jeff Layton who has recently done a lot of getname work and I
> want to make sure he sees this.
Thanks, will try with his patchset applied, but see below...
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:56:59 -0700
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net> wrote:
> > @@ -978,6 +986,9 @@ static int __init audit_init(void)
> > else
> > audit_sock->sk_sndtimeo = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
> >
> > + if (register_trace_getname(audit_getname, NULL))
> > + audit_panic("cannot register getname tracepoint");
> > +
> > skb_queue_head_init(&audit_skb_queue);
> > skb_queue_head_init(&audit_skb_hold_queue);
> > audit_initialized = AUDIT_INITIALIZED;
>
> I think we need to just use panic instead of audit_panic. This early
I don't have an opinion on that matter, just used what is done on the 'true'
part of that other else, some lines above the register_trace_getname if:
audit_sock = netlink_kernel_create(&init_net, NETLINK_AUDIT,
THIS_MODULE, &cfg);
if (!audit_sock)
audit_panic("cannot initialize netlink socket");
else
audit_sock->sk_sndtimeo = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
> at boot userspace would not have been able to tell the kernel that
> audit_panic == panic nor would the box die later if userspace ask for
> that functionality. Instead the box would run but audit would be
But then why audit_panic is called when netlink_kernel_create fails?
> broken, which customers who want audit_panic == panic would be most
> upset about.
>
> Otherwise, its good to me.
Thanks!
- Arnaldo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-20 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-19 22:56 [PATCH 1/1] audit: Use a tracepoint for getname Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-09-20 7:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-09-20 13:05 ` Eric Paris
2012-09-20 13:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-09-20 15:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120920151136.GD11325@ghostprotocols.net \
--to=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox