public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] uprobes: Kill set_orig_insn()->is_swbp_at_addr()
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:19:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120923201950.GA27456@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120923201921.GA27424@redhat.com>

Unlike set_swbp(), set_orig_insn()->is_swbp_at_addr() makes sense,
although it can't prevent all confusions.

But the usage of is_swbp_at_addr() is equally confusing, and it adds
the extra get_user_pages() we can avoid.

This patch removes set_orig_insn()->is_swbp_at_addr() but changes
write_opcode() to do the necessary checks before replace_page().

Perhaps it also makes sense to ensure PAGE_MAPPING_ANON in unregister
case.

find_active_uprobe() becomes the only user of is_swbp_at_addr(),
we can change its semantics.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/events/uprobes.c |   32 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 100a920..17454fb 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -190,6 +190,25 @@ static void copy_opcode(struct page *page, unsigned long vaddr, uprobe_opcode_t
 	kunmap_atomic(kaddr);
 }
 
+static int verify_opcode(struct page *page, unsigned long vaddr, uprobe_opcode_t *new_opcode)
+{
+	uprobe_opcode_t old_opcode;
+	bool is_swbp;
+
+	copy_opcode(page, vaddr, &old_opcode);
+	is_swbp = is_swbp_insn(&old_opcode);
+
+	if (is_swbp_insn(new_opcode)) {
+		if (is_swbp)		/* register: already installed? */
+			return 0;
+	} else {
+		if (!is_swbp)		/* unregister: was it changed by us? */
+			return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
 /*
  * NOTE:
  * Expect the breakpoint instruction to be the smallest size instruction for
@@ -226,6 +245,10 @@ retry:
 	if (ret <= 0)
 		return ret;
 
+	ret = verify_opcode(old_page, vaddr, &opcode);
+	if (ret <= 0)
+		goto put_old;
+
 	ret = -ENOMEM;
 	new_page = alloc_page_vma(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE, vma, vaddr);
 	if (!new_page)
@@ -311,15 +334,6 @@ int __weak set_swbp(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned
 int __weak
 set_orig_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr)
 {
-	int result;
-
-	result = is_swbp_at_addr(mm, vaddr);
-	if (!result)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	if (result != 1)
-		return result;
-
 	return write_opcode(mm, vaddr, *(uprobe_opcode_t *)auprobe->insn);
 }
 
-- 
1.5.5.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-23 20:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-23 20:19 [PATCH 0/4] uprobes: remove is_swbp_at_addr() from register/unregister Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-23 20:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] uprobes: Kill set_swbp()->is_swbp_at_addr() Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-24  9:03   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-24 15:23     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-24  9:08   ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-09-24 16:02     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06  6:55   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-23 20:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] uprobes: Introduce copy_opcode(), kill read_opcode() Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06  6:59   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-23 20:19 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-09-24  9:13   ` [PATCH 3/4] uprobes: Kill set_orig_insn()->is_swbp_at_addr() Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-24 15:23     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06  7:18   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-23 20:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] uprobes: Simplify is_swbp_at_addr(), remove stale comments Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06  7:11   ` Srikar Dronamraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120923201950.GA27456@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=anton@redhat.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox