From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] uprobes: Simplify is_swbp_at_addr(), remove stale comments
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:19:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120923201953.GA27463@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120923201921.GA27424@redhat.com>
After the previous change is_swbp_at_addr() is always called with
current->mm. Remove this check and move it close to its single caller.
Also, remove the obsolete comment about is_swbp_at_addr() and
uprobe_state.count.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 73 +++++++++++++++-------------------------------
1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 17454fb..a741ba7 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -282,32 +282,6 @@ put_old:
return ret;
}
-static int is_swbp_at_addr(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr)
-{
- struct page *page;
- uprobe_opcode_t opcode;
- int result;
-
- if (current->mm == mm) {
- pagefault_disable();
- result = __copy_from_user_inatomic(&opcode, (void __user*)vaddr,
- sizeof(opcode));
- pagefault_enable();
-
- if (likely(result == 0))
- goto out;
- }
-
- result = get_user_pages(NULL, mm, vaddr, 1, 0, 1, &page, NULL);
- if (result < 0)
- return result;
-
- copy_opcode(page, vaddr, &opcode);
- put_page(page);
- out:
- return is_swbp_insn(&opcode);
-}
-
/**
* set_swbp - store breakpoint at a given address.
* @auprobe: arch specific probepoint information.
@@ -589,29 +563,6 @@ static int copy_insn(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct file *filp)
return __copy_insn(mapping, filp, uprobe->arch.insn, bytes, uprobe->offset);
}
-/*
- * How mm->uprobes_state.count gets updated
- * uprobe_mmap() increments the count if
- * - it successfully adds a breakpoint.
- * - it cannot add a breakpoint, but sees that there is a underlying
- * breakpoint (via a is_swbp_at_addr()).
- *
- * uprobe_munmap() decrements the count if
- * - it sees a underlying breakpoint, (via is_swbp_at_addr)
- * (Subsequent uprobe_unregister wouldnt find the breakpoint
- * unless a uprobe_mmap kicks in, since the old vma would be
- * dropped just after uprobe_munmap.)
- *
- * uprobe_register increments the count if:
- * - it successfully adds a breakpoint.
- *
- * uprobe_unregister decrements the count if:
- * - it sees a underlying breakpoint and removes successfully.
- * (via is_swbp_at_addr)
- * (Subsequent uprobe_munmap wouldnt find the breakpoint
- * since there is no underlying breakpoint after the
- * breakpoint removal.)
- */
static int
install_breakpoint(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,
struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long vaddr)
@@ -1389,6 +1340,30 @@ static void mmf_recalc_uprobes(struct mm_struct *mm)
clear_bit(MMF_HAS_UPROBES, &mm->flags);
}
+static int is_swbp_at_addr(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr)
+{
+ struct page *page;
+ uprobe_opcode_t opcode;
+ int result;
+
+ pagefault_disable();
+ result = __copy_from_user_inatomic(&opcode, (void __user*)vaddr,
+ sizeof(opcode));
+ pagefault_enable();
+
+ if (likely(result == 0))
+ goto out;
+
+ result = get_user_pages(NULL, mm, vaddr, 1, 0, 1, &page, NULL);
+ if (result < 0)
+ return result;
+
+ copy_opcode(page, vaddr, &opcode);
+ put_page(page);
+ out:
+ return is_swbp_insn(&opcode);
+}
+
static struct uprobe *find_active_uprobe(unsigned long bp_vaddr, int *is_swbp)
{
struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-23 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-23 20:19 [PATCH 0/4] uprobes: remove is_swbp_at_addr() from register/unregister Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-23 20:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] uprobes: Kill set_swbp()->is_swbp_at_addr() Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-24 9:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-24 15:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-24 9:08 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-09-24 16:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 6:55 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-23 20:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] uprobes: Introduce copy_opcode(), kill read_opcode() Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 6:59 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-23 20:19 ` [PATCH 3/4] uprobes: Kill set_orig_insn()->is_swbp_at_addr() Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-24 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-24 15:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 7:18 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-23 20:19 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-10-06 7:11 ` [PATCH 4/4] uprobes: Simplify is_swbp_at_addr(), remove stale comments Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120923201953.GA27463@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox