From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755985Ab2IYLzE (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 07:55:04 -0400 Received: from zimbra.linbit.com ([212.69.161.123]:55477 "EHLO zimbra.linbit.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755054Ab2IYLy7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 07:54:59 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:54:52 +0200 From: Lars Ellenberg To: Kent Overstreet Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Chris Mason , neilb@suse.de, Jiri Kosina , Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky , Alasdair Kergon , tj@kernel.org, Steven Whitehouse , vgoyal@redhat.com, Lars Ellenberg Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH v3 06/26] block: Add bio_end_sector() Message-ID: <20120925115452.GF8143@soda.linbit> Mail-Followup-To: Kent Overstreet , linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Chris Mason , neilb@suse.de, Jiri Kosina , Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky , Alasdair Kergon , tj@kernel.org, Steven Whitehouse , vgoyal@redhat.com, Lars Ellenberg References: <1348526106-17074-1-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> <1348526106-17074-7-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1348526106-17074-7-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:34:46PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > Just a little convenience macro - main reason to add it now is preparing > for immutable bio vecs, it'll reduce the size of the patch that puts > bi_sector/bi_size/bi_idx into a struct bvec_iter. For the DRBD part: > diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c > index 01b2ac6..d90a1fd 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c > +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c > @@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ void drbd_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio) > /* to make some things easier, force alignment of requests within the > * granularity of our hash tables */ > s_enr = bio->bi_sector >> HT_SHIFT; > - e_enr = bio->bi_size ? (bio->bi_sector+(bio->bi_size>>9)-1) >> HT_SHIFT : s_enr; > + e_enr = (bio_end_sector(bio) - 1) >> HT_SHIFT; You ignored the bio->bi_size ? : ; #define bio_end_sector(bio) ((bio)->bi_sector + bio_sectors(bio)) which turns out (bio->bi_sector + (bio->bi_size >> 9)) Note that bi_size may be 0, bio_end_sector(bio)-1 then is bi_sector -1, for an empty flush with bi_sector == 0, this ends up as (sector_t)-1ULL, and this code path breaks horribly. + e_enr = bio->bi_size ? (bio_end_sector(bio) - 1) >> HT_SHIFT : s_enr; Thanks, Lars