From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Paweł Sikora" <pluto@pld-linux.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arekm@pld-linux.org, baggins@pld-linux.org
Subject: Re: [3.5.4] rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU { 1} (t=54862991 jiffies)
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:44:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120925164454.GA22330@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2429639.puuGestFgj@localhost>
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 06:31:36PM +0200, Paweł Sikora wrote:
> On Monday 24 of September 2012 10:36:33 Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:05:23AM +0200, Paweł Sikora wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > with the new stable line i'm observing strange locks on my old amd-phenom-II mini-server.
> > > here's a dmesg:
> >
> > Did this show up in 3.5.3? If not, can you run 'git bisect' to find the
> > problem patch?
>
> heh, the old good kernel put some light on this issue.
>
> Sep 25 08:50:24 nexus kernel: [60330.301639] Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -474690884 ns)
> Sep 25 08:50:24 nexus kernel: [60330.325477] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> Sep 25 08:50:24 nexus kernel: [60330.325484] WARNING: at /home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/kernel-2.6.37.6/linux-2.6.37/net/sched/sch_generic.c:258 dev_watchdog+0x25d/0x270()
> Sep 25 08:50:24 nexus kernel: [60330.325486] Hardware name: GA-MA785GMT-UD2H
> Sep 25 08:50:24 nexus kernel: [60330.325487] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out
> (...)
> Sep 25 08:50:25 nexus kernel: [60330.851093] Switching to clocksource acpi_pm
>
> afaics, this amd-phenom cpu does the cpu frequency scaling and causes plain 'tsc' timer
> instability which leads to network card watchdog timeout (i can login via local console
> while any network traffic is dead). on the recent 3.5.x kernel the 'clocksource unstable'
> message appears *after* 'task blocked' flood and there's no clear info about watchog timeout.
> currently i'm testing hpet clocksource becasue better tsc modes (constant_tsc, nonstop_tsc)
> aren't present in /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource while
> cpu supports them.
I'm sorry, I don't understand, that's a 2.6.37 kernel you are comparing
this to. Where did this problem show up? In 3.5.4 where 3.5.3 was
fine?
Or somewhere else?
confused,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-25 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-24 8:05 [3.5.4] rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU { 1} (t=54862991 jiffies) Paweł Sikora
2012-09-24 17:36 ` Greg KH
2012-09-25 16:31 ` Paweł Sikora
2012-09-25 16:44 ` Greg KH [this message]
2012-09-25 17:04 ` Paweł Sikora
2012-09-25 19:42 ` Greg KH
2012-10-03 18:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120925164454.GA22330@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=arekm@pld-linux.org \
--cc=baggins@pld-linux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pluto@pld-linux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox