public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix build with CMA && !CONFIG_COMPACTION
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:31:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120926123134.GJ11266@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348661586-22970-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 01:13:06PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> In -next 20120926 "mm: compaction: cache if a pageblock was scanned and
> no pages were isolated" adds pageblock skipping operations used when CMA
> is enabled but only provides them if CONFIG_COMPACTION is defined, breaking
> the build. Fix this by also providing them when only CONFIG_CMA is enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

Thanks but I've already pushed an alternative patch towards Andrew for
this particular build problem. The patch explains why the fix is different.

---8<---
mm: compaction: cache if a pageblock was scanned and no pages were isolated -fix

Fengguang Wu reported the following

tree:   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git since-3.5
head:   2f641f902ca76711e47e8d3b18004f0e46ca3d9b
commit: 7faeb2a39c789f1bac69014cc468677a60b73395 [184/186] mm:
compaction: cache if a pageblock was scanned and no pages were isolated
config: i386-randconfig-b083 (attached as .config)

All error/warnings:

mm/compaction.c: In function 'isolation_suitable':
mm/compaction.c:60:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'get_pageblock_skip' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
mm/compaction.c: In function 'reset_isolation_suitable':
mm/compaction.c:94:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'clear_pageblock_skip' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
mm/compaction.c: In function 'update_pageblock_skip':
mm/compaction.c:108:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_pageblock_skip' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
mm/compaction.c: At top level:
mm/compaction.c:68:13: warning: 'reset_isolation_suitable' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
mm/compaction.c:177:13: warning: 'compact_capture_page' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

Michal Hocko suggested implementing !CONFIG_COMPACTION versions of these
functions but that still leaves the dead version of
reset_isolation_suitable in the !CONFIG_COMPACTION && CONFIG_CMA case.
Create !CONFIG_COMPACTION versions of isolation_suitable() and
update_pageblock_skip() instead.

This is a fix for
mm-compaction-cache-if-a-pageblock-was-scanned-and-no-pages-were-isolated.patch

Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
---
 mm/compaction.c |   12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index 5ffe9a5..fb07abb 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ static inline bool migrate_async_suitable(int migratetype)
 	return is_migrate_cma(migratetype) || migratetype == MIGRATE_MOVABLE;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPACTION
 /* Returns true if the pageblock should be scanned for pages to isolate. */
 static inline bool isolation_suitable(struct compact_control *cc,
 					struct page *page)
@@ -107,6 +108,17 @@ static void update_pageblock_skip(struct page *page, unsigned long nr_isolated)
 	if (!nr_isolated)
 		set_pageblock_skip(page);
 }
+#else
+static inline bool isolation_suitable(struct compact_control *cc,
+					struct page *page)
+{
+	return true;
+}
+
+static void update_pageblock_skip(struct page *page, unsigned long nr_isolated)
+{
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_COMPACTION */
 
 static inline bool should_release_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
 {

      reply	other threads:[~2012-09-26 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-26 12:13 [PATCH] mm: Fix build with CMA && !CONFIG_COMPACTION Mark Brown
2012-09-26 12:31 ` Mel Gorman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120926123134.GJ11266@suse.de \
    --to=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aquini@redhat.com \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox