From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] workqueue: simplify is_chained_work()
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:28:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120926182837.GE12544@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348680043-5077-5-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:20:35AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> is_chained_work() is too complicated. we can simply found out
> whether current task is worker by PF_WQ_WORKER or wq->rescuer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> kernel/workqueue.c | 36 ++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index e41c562..c718b94 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -1182,34 +1182,22 @@ static void insert_work(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq,
>
> /*
> * Test whether @work is being queued from another work executing on the
> - * same workqueue. This is rather expensive and should only be used from
> - * cold paths.
> + * same workqueue.
> */
> static bool is_chained_work(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
> {
> - unsigned long flags;
> - unsigned int cpu;
> + struct worker *worker = NULL;
>
> - for_each_gcwq_cpu(cpu) {
> - struct global_cwq *gcwq = get_gcwq(cpu);
> - struct worker *worker;
> - struct hlist_node *pos;
> - int i;
> + if (wq->rescuer && current == wq->rescuer->task) /* rescuer_thread() */
> + worker = wq->rescuer;
> + else if (current->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER) /* worker_thread() */
> + worker = kthread_data(current);
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&gcwq->lock, flags);
> - for_each_busy_worker(worker, i, pos, gcwq) {
> - if (worker->task != current)
> - continue;
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gcwq->lock, flags);
> - /*
> - * I'm @worker, no locking necessary. See if @work
> - * is headed to the same workqueue.
> - */
> - return worker->current_cwq->wq == wq;
> - }
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gcwq->lock, flags);
> - }
> - return false;
> + /*
> + * I'm @worker, no locking necessary. See if @work
> + * is headed to the same workqueue.
> + */
> + return worker && worker->current_cwq->wq == wq;
How about,
if (wq->rescuer && current == wq->rescuer->task)
worker = wq->rescuer;
else if (current->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER)
worker = kthread_data(current);
else
return NULL;
return worker->curent_cwq->wq == wq;
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-26 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-26 17:20 [PATCH 00/12] workqueue: simple cleanups Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 01/12] workqueue: add WORKER_RESCUER Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:07 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-28 10:11 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 02/12] workqueue: disallow set_cpus_allowed_ptr() from work item Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:12 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 03/12] workqueue: remove WORKER_PREP from rescuer Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:24 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-28 10:04 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-30 7:39 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 04/12] workqueue: simplify is_chained_work() Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:28 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-09-28 9:52 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-30 7:32 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 05/12] workqueue: don't wake up other workers in rescuer Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:34 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-28 10:18 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 06/12] workqueue: destroy_worker() can only destory idle worker not just created worker Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:35 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 07/12] workqueue: remove WORKER_STARTED Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:36 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-28 9:52 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 08/12] workqueue: fix comments of insert_work() Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 09/12] workqueue: declare system_highpri_wq Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 10/12] cpu-hotplug.txt: fix comments of work_on_cpu() Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] workqueue: add WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE to system_long_wq Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:38 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-28 8:06 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-30 7:22 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 12/12] workqueue: avoid work_on_cpu() to interfere system_wq Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120926182837.GE12544@google.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox