From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755794Ab2I0VS7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:18:59 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:35901 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755681Ab2I0VS6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:18:58 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:18:56 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: wency@cn.fujitsu.com, Lai Jiangshan Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, liuj97@gmail.com, len.brown@intel.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, minchan.kim@gmail.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] bugfix for memory hotplug Message-Id: <20120927141856.732ded79.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1348724705-23779-1-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1348724705-23779-1-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I'll assume that you will be preparing a new revision of these patches. We have another patch series today called "memory_hotplug: fix memory hotplug bug", from another Fujitsu person. But you people aren't cc'ing each other. Please do so and please review and if possible test each others' work? I'm assuming that the "memory_hotplug: fix memory hotplug bug" series will also go through another revision? I don't think I was cc'ed on the second patch in that series btw.