public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Cc: "Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: radeon: Regression between v3.6-rc4 and v3.6-rc6: unable to allocate a PPLL
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:23:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201209271523.49437.andres@anarazel.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADnq5_ME14tfMz9ZzVqBFx7TYSyKLc=iPQVthu1n77j-yfdxVA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thursday, September 27, 2012 03:14:31 PM Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 03:42:40 PM Deucher, Alexander wrote:
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Andres Freund [mailto:andres@anarazel.de]
> >> > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 9:41 AM
> >> > To: Dan Carpenter
> >> > Cc: Deucher, Alexander; LKML; David Airlie;
> >> > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: radeon: Regression
> >> > between v3.6-rc4 and v3.6-rc6: unable to allocate a PPLL
> >> > 
> >> > On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 03:00:09 PM Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >> > > This is fixed now?
> >> > 
> >> > Its been reverted in 2f1f4d9b60396d2df4cff829bd5376ffc8ed9a2c which is
> >> > in rc6.
> >> > 
> >> > On Monday, September 17, 2012 09:30:12 PM Deucher, Alexander wrote:
> >> > Sorry, I somehow accidentally marked your  email as read and thus
> >> > didn't notice it.
> >> > 
> >> > > I think I see the problem.  I think it's a limitation of the current
> >> > > current
> >> > 
> >> > modesetting API.  The current API sets up each display independently
> >> > which doesn't work so well if there are resource restrictions.  There
> >> > shouldn't be any contention on your board since you are only using 2
> >> > non-DP displays.  It looks like X is mapping different crtcs to
> >> > displays than the kernel fb.
> >> > 
> >> > Initially the kernel set up the follow:
> >> > > > [    2.134901] [drm] crtc 0 using pll 0x2
> >> > > > [    2.362257] [drm] crtc 1 using pll 0x1
> >> > > > [    2.386709] [drm] crtc 2 using pll 0x0
> >> > > 
> >> > > Crtc 0 -> DCPLL -> DP
> >> > > Crtc 1 -> PPLL2 -> DVI
> >> > > Crtc 2 -> PPLL1 -> DVI
> >> > > 
> >> > > When X loads, it tried to set a different crtc to display mapping:
> >> > > > [   60.679310] [drm] crtc 0 using pll 0xff
> >> > > > [   60.789183] [drm] crtc 1 using pll 0x2
> >> > > > [   60.819594] [drm] crtc 2 using pll 0x1
> >> > > 
> >> > > Crtc 0 -> INVALID -> DVI 0
> >> > > Crtc 1 -> DCPLL -> DP
> >> > > Crtc 2 -> PPLL2 -> DVI 1
> >> > > 
> >> > > Crtc 0 should have used PPLL1 or PPLL2, but they were already in use
> >> > > by crtc 1 and crtc  2 from the previous modeset.  Since the modeset
> >> > > API is not atomic, it doesn't have the whole picture.  I'm not sure
> >> > > of a good solution right now prior to the new atomic modeset API
> >> > > that is under discussion.  I guess we can revert the patch for 3.6.
> >> > >  For 3.7 I guess we need to validate the actual connector to make
> >> > > sure we aren't trying to set a different configuration relating to
> >> > > the same connector without first tearing down the first one.  In
> >> > > the interim, you should be able to work around it by disabling the
> >> > > non-DP outputs and then bringing than back up.
> >> > 
> >> > Thanks! That explanation makes sense. I can work around it just fine,
> >> > starting X multiple times works which coincides nicely with your
> >> > explanation.
> >> > 
> >> > The code in the 3.7 branch doesn't do that extended validation yet,
> >> > rigth? If you want/need you can CC for testing once thats ready.
> >> 
> >> It should handle it now.  If you could test it that would be great.
> > 
> > Ok, just to be sure I tested Linus' tree and everything works fine there.
> > 
> > Unfortunately thats not the case with a straight merge of
> > alexdeucher/drm- next-3.7-wip. When gdm started *the first time* the
> > DVI-connected (uhm, same sink type? Thats the saphire magic allowing
> > more monitors on that type of graphics card?) I got a "unable to
> > allocate a PPLL" error again. Logging in/starting a new X seems to fix
> > that.
> 
> So you have a xorg.conf with a hardcoded configuration?  If so can you
> send it to me?
Yes, but just setting the xrand positions:

Section "Monitor"
	Identifier   "DVI-1"
	Option	     "Primary"		"True"
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
	Identifier   "DVI-0"
        Option	     "RightOf"		"DVI-1"
	Option	     "Rotate"		"Left"
	Option	     "Primary"		"False"
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
	Identifier   "Displayport-0"
        Option	     "LeftOf"		"DVI-1"
	Option	     "Rotate"		"Left"
	Option	     "Primary"		"False"
EndSection


Andres

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-27 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-17 11:29 radeon: Regression between v3.6-rc4 and v3.6-rc6: unable to allocate a PPLL Andres Freund
2012-09-17 13:16 ` Deucher, Alexander
2012-09-17 13:55   ` Andres Freund
2012-09-17 14:24     ` Deucher, Alexander
2012-09-17 17:15       ` Andres Freund
2012-09-17 19:30         ` Deucher, Alexander
2012-09-26 13:00           ` Dan Carpenter
2012-09-26 13:20             ` Deucher, Alexander
2012-09-26 13:41             ` Andres Freund
2012-09-26 13:42               ` Deucher, Alexander
2012-09-27  6:46                 ` Andres Freund
2012-09-27 13:14                   ` Alex Deucher
2012-09-27 13:23                     ` Andres Freund [this message]
2012-09-27 14:54                       ` Alex Deucher
2012-09-27 16:19                         ` Alex Deucher
2012-10-02 17:04                           ` Andres Freund

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201209271523.49437.andres@anarazel.de \
    --to=andres@anarazel.de \
    --cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox