[PATCH 0/3] 3.5-stable timekeeping fixes merged in 3.6

[PATCH 0/3] 3.5-stable timekeeping fixes merged in 3.6

[John Stultz]

Just wanted to send out a few timekeeping fixes that were merged
in 3.6 which are appropriate for -stable.

This queue backports the following fixes:
-----------------------------------------
cee58483cf56e0ba355fdd97ff5e8925329aa936    time: Move ktime_t overflow checking into timespec_valid_strict
bf2ac312195155511a0f79325515cbb61929898a    time: Avoid making adjustments if we haven't accumulated anything
4e8b14526ca7fb046a81c94002c1c43b6fdf0e9b    time: Improve sanity checking of timekeeping inputs

I've run these through my timetest suite w/ kvm on both i386
& x86_64. But more testing would be of course appreciated.
	https://github.com/johnstultz-work/timetests

I also have patch queues for all the -stable trees that I'll be
sending out as my testing completes for those trees.

Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>

John Stultz (3):
  3.5.y: time: Improve sanity checking of timekeeping inputs
  3.5.y: time: Avoid making adjustments if we haven't accumulated
    anything
  3.5.y: time: Move ktime_t overflow checking into
    timespec_valid_strict

 include/linux/ktime.h     |    7 -------
 include/linux/time.h      |   29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 kernel/time/timekeeping.c |   32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.9.5

[PATCH 1/3] 3.5.y: time: Improve sanity checking of timekeeping inputs

[John Stultz]

This is a -stable backport of 4e8b14526ca7fb046a81c94002c1c43b6fdf0e9b

Unexpected behavior could occur if the time is set to a value large
enough to overflow a 64bit ktime_t (which is something larger then the
year 2262).

Also unexpected behavior could occur if large negative offsets are
injected via adjtimex.

So this patch improves the sanity check timekeeping inputs by
improving the timespec_valid() check, and then makes better use of
timespec_valid() to make sure we don't set the time to an invalid
negative value or one that overflows ktime_t.

Note: This does not protect from setting the time close to overflowing
ktime_t and then letting natural accumulation cause the overflow.

Reported-by: CAI Qian <caiqian@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Zhouping Liu <zliu@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1344454580-17031-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
---
 include/linux/ktime.h     |    7 -------
 include/linux/time.h      |   22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
 kernel/time/timekeeping.c |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/ktime.h b/include/linux/ktime.h
index 603bec2..06177ba10 100644
--- a/include/linux/ktime.h
+++ b/include/linux/ktime.h
@@ -58,13 +58,6 @@ union ktime {
 
 typedef union ktime ktime_t;		/* Kill this */
 
-#define KTIME_MAX			((s64)~((u64)1 << 63))
-#if (BITS_PER_LONG == 64)
-# define KTIME_SEC_MAX			(KTIME_MAX / NSEC_PER_SEC)
-#else
-# define KTIME_SEC_MAX			LONG_MAX
-#endif
-
 /*
  * ktime_t definitions when using the 64-bit scalar representation:
  */
diff --git a/include/linux/time.h b/include/linux/time.h
index c81c5e4..b0bbd8f 100644
--- a/include/linux/time.h
+++ b/include/linux/time.h
@@ -107,11 +107,29 @@ static inline struct timespec timespec_sub(struct timespec lhs,
 	return ts_delta;
 }
 
+#define KTIME_MAX			((s64)~((u64)1 << 63))
+#if (BITS_PER_LONG == 64)
+# define KTIME_SEC_MAX			(KTIME_MAX / NSEC_PER_SEC)
+#else
+# define KTIME_SEC_MAX			LONG_MAX
+#endif
+
 /*
  * Returns true if the timespec is norm, false if denorm:
  */
-#define timespec_valid(ts) \
-	(((ts)->tv_sec >= 0) && (((unsigned long) (ts)->tv_nsec) < NSEC_PER_SEC))
+static inline bool timespec_valid(const struct timespec *ts)
+{
+	/* Dates before 1970 are bogus */
+	if (ts->tv_sec < 0)
+		return false;
+	/* Can't have more nanoseconds then a second */
+	if ((unsigned long)ts->tv_nsec >= NSEC_PER_SEC)
+		return false;
+	/* Disallow values that could overflow ktime_t */
+	if ((unsigned long long)ts->tv_sec >= KTIME_SEC_MAX)
+		return false;
+	return true;
+}
 
 extern void read_persistent_clock(struct timespec *ts);
 extern void read_boot_clock(struct timespec *ts);
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index 3447cfa..fd06ae8 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ int do_settimeofday(const struct timespec *tv)
 	struct timespec ts_delta;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	if ((unsigned long)tv->tv_nsec >= NSEC_PER_SEC)
+	if (!timespec_valid(tv))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	write_seqlock_irqsave(&timekeeper.lock, flags);
@@ -418,6 +418,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(do_settimeofday);
 int timekeeping_inject_offset(struct timespec *ts)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
+	struct timespec tmp;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	if ((unsigned long)ts->tv_nsec >= NSEC_PER_SEC)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -426,10 +428,17 @@ int timekeeping_inject_offset(struct timespec *ts)
 
 	timekeeping_forward_now();
 
+	tmp = timespec_add(timekeeper.xtime,  *ts);
+	if (!timespec_valid(&tmp)) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto error;
+	}
+
 	timekeeper.xtime = timespec_add(timekeeper.xtime, *ts);
 	timekeeper.wall_to_monotonic =
 				timespec_sub(timekeeper.wall_to_monotonic, *ts);
 
+error: /* even if we error out, we forwarded the time, so call update */
 	timekeeping_update(true);
 
 	write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper.lock, flags);
@@ -437,7 +446,7 @@ int timekeeping_inject_offset(struct timespec *ts)
 	/* signal hrtimers about time change */
 	clock_was_set();
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(timekeeping_inject_offset);
 
@@ -597,7 +606,20 @@ void __init timekeeping_init(void)
 	struct timespec now, boot;
 
 	read_persistent_clock(&now);
+	if (!timespec_valid(&now)) {
+		pr_warn("WARNING: Persistent clock returned invalid value!\n"
+			"         Check your CMOS/BIOS settings.\n");
+		now.tv_sec = 0;
+		now.tv_nsec = 0;
+	}
+
 	read_boot_clock(&boot);
+	if (!timespec_valid(&boot)) {
+		pr_warn("WARNING: Boot clock returned invalid value!\n"
+			"         Check your CMOS/BIOS settings.\n");
+		boot.tv_sec = 0;
+		boot.tv_nsec = 0;
+	}
 
 	seqlock_init(&timekeeper.lock);
 
-- 
1.7.9.5

[PATCH 2/3] 3.5.y: time: Avoid making adjustments if we haven't accumulated anything

[John Stultz]

This is a -stable backport of bf2ac312195155511a0f79325515cbb61929898a

If update_wall_time() is called and the current offset isn't large
enough to accumulate, avoid re-calling timekeeping_adjust which may
change the clock freq and can cause 1ns inconsistencies with
CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE/CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE.

Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1345595449-34965-5-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
---
 kernel/time/timekeeping.c |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index fd06ae8..df9447b 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -1055,6 +1055,10 @@ static void update_wall_time(void)
 #else
 	offset = (clock->read(clock) - clock->cycle_last) & clock->mask;
 #endif
+	/* Check if there's really nothing to do */
+	if (offset < timekeeper.cycle_interval)
+		goto out;
+
 	timekeeper.xtime_nsec = (s64)timekeeper.xtime.tv_nsec <<
 						timekeeper.shift;
 
-- 
1.7.9.5

[PATCH 3/3] 3.5.y: time: Move ktime_t overflow checking into timespec_valid_strict

[John Stultz]

This is a -stable backport of cee58483cf56e0ba355fdd97ff5e8925329aa936

Andreas Bombe reported that the added ktime_t overflow checking added to
timespec_valid in commit 4e8b14526ca7 ("time: Improve sanity checking of
timekeeping inputs") was causing problems with X.org because it caused
timeouts larger then KTIME_T to be invalid.

Previously, these large timeouts would be clamped to KTIME_MAX and would
never expire, which is valid.

This patch splits the ktime_t overflow checking into a new
timespec_valid_strict function, and converts the timekeeping codes
internal checking to use this more strict function.

Reported-and-tested-by: Andreas Bombe <aeb@debian.org>
Cc: Zhouping Liu <zliu@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
---
 include/linux/time.h      |    7 +++++++
 kernel/time/timekeeping.c |   10 +++++-----
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/time.h b/include/linux/time.h
index b0bbd8f..b51e664 100644
--- a/include/linux/time.h
+++ b/include/linux/time.h
@@ -125,6 +125,13 @@ static inline bool timespec_valid(const struct timespec *ts)
 	/* Can't have more nanoseconds then a second */
 	if ((unsigned long)ts->tv_nsec >= NSEC_PER_SEC)
 		return false;
+	return true;
+}
+
+static inline bool timespec_valid_strict(const struct timespec *ts)
+{
+	if (!timespec_valid(ts))
+		return false;
 	/* Disallow values that could overflow ktime_t */
 	if ((unsigned long long)ts->tv_sec >= KTIME_SEC_MAX)
 		return false;
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index df9447b..63c88c1 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ int do_settimeofday(const struct timespec *tv)
 	struct timespec ts_delta;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	if (!timespec_valid(tv))
+	if (!timespec_valid_strict(tv))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	write_seqlock_irqsave(&timekeeper.lock, flags);
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ int timekeeping_inject_offset(struct timespec *ts)
 	timekeeping_forward_now();
 
 	tmp = timespec_add(timekeeper.xtime,  *ts);
-	if (!timespec_valid(&tmp)) {
+	if (!timespec_valid_strict(&tmp)) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto error;
 	}
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ void __init timekeeping_init(void)
 	struct timespec now, boot;
 
 	read_persistent_clock(&now);
-	if (!timespec_valid(&now)) {
+	if (!timespec_valid_strict(&now)) {
 		pr_warn("WARNING: Persistent clock returned invalid value!\n"
 			"         Check your CMOS/BIOS settings.\n");
 		now.tv_sec = 0;
@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ void __init timekeeping_init(void)
 	}
 
 	read_boot_clock(&boot);
-	if (!timespec_valid(&boot)) {
+	if (!timespec_valid_strict(&boot)) {
 		pr_warn("WARNING: Boot clock returned invalid value!\n"
 			"         Check your CMOS/BIOS settings.\n");
 		boot.tv_sec = 0;
@@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ static void update_sleep_time(struct timespec t)
  */
 static void __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(struct timespec *delta)
 {
-	if (!timespec_valid(delta)) {
+	if (!timespec_valid_strict(delta)) {
 		printk(KERN_WARNING "__timekeeping_inject_sleeptime: Invalid "
 					"sleep delta value!\n");
 		return;
-- 
1.7.9.5

Re: [PATCH 0/3] 3.5-stable timekeeping fixes merged in 3.6

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 02:56:18PM -0400, John Stultz wrote:
> Just wanted to send out a few timekeeping fixes that were merged
> in 3.6 which are appropriate for -stable.
> 
> This queue backports the following fixes:
> -----------------------------------------
> cee58483cf56e0ba355fdd97ff5e8925329aa936    time: Move ktime_t overflow checking into timespec_valid_strict
> bf2ac312195155511a0f79325515cbb61929898a    time: Avoid making adjustments if we haven't accumulated anything
> 4e8b14526ca7fb046a81c94002c1c43b6fdf0e9b    time: Improve sanity checking of timekeeping inputs
> 
> I've run these through my timetest suite w/ kvm on both i386
> & x86_64. But more testing would be of course appreciated.
> 	https://github.com/johnstultz-work/timetests
> 
> I also have patch queues for all the -stable trees that I'll be
> sending out as my testing completes for those trees.

Applied, thanks.

greg k-h