From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755186Ab2I0UjS (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:39:18 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:55705 "EHLO mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752087Ab2I0UjR (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:39:17 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:39:11 -0700 From: Greg KH To: John Stultz Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Prarit Bhargava , Thomas Gleixner , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] 3.2-stable timekeeping fixes merged in 3.6 Message-ID: <20120927203911.GC19489@kroah.com> References: <1347402926-34813-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1347402926-34813-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 06:35:23PM -0400, John Stultz wrote: > Just wanted to send out a few timekeeping fixes that were merged > in 3.6 which are appropriate for -stable. > > This queue backports the following fixes: > ----------------------------------------- > cee58483cf56e0ba355fdd97ff5e8925329aa936 time: Move ktime_t overflow checking into timespec_valid_strict > bf2ac312195155511a0f79325515cbb61929898a time: Avoid making adjustments if we haven't accumulated anything > 4e8b14526ca7fb046a81c94002c1c43b6fdf0e9b time: Improve sanity checking of timekeeping inputs > > I've run these through my timetest suite w/ kvm on both i386 > & x86_64. But more testing would be of course appreciated. > https://github.com/johnstultz-work/timetests > > I also have patch queues for all the -stable trees that I'll be > sending out as my testing completes for those trees. Did you also send these out for the 3.0.y tree and I just missed them? Should I just take this 3.2.y series and see how they well apply? thanks, greg k-h