From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757240Ab2I1L4i (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 07:56:38 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:53977 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753720Ab2I1L4g (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 07:56:36 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:56:35 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alex Kelly , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the vfs tree Message-ID: <20120928115635.GE13973@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20120928155639.aadab0554080381b4c38a847@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120928155639.aadab0554080381b4c38a847@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 03:56:39PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Al, > > Today's linux-next merge of the signal tree got a conflict in fs/exec.c > between commit 5b8a94d461a7 ("coredump: move core dump functionality into > its own file") from the vfs tree and commits 70446600fa12 ("arm: > introduce ret_from_kernel_execve(), switch to generic kernel_execve()") > and 5e41814a7d8b ("arm: get rid of execve wrapper, switch to generic > execve() implementation") from the signal tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). > > BTW, Al, you have that vfs tree commit (and others) authored by you ... Gyah... Will fix ASAP; sorry, guys.