From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757836Ab2I1NUE (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:20:04 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:35465 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751561Ab2I1NUC (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:20:02 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:19:49 +0100 From: Mel Gorman To: Glauber Costa Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH] make GFP_NOTRACK flag unconditional Message-ID: <20120928131949.GE29125@suse.de> References: <1348826194-21781-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1348826194-21781-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:56:34PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > There was a general sentiment in a recent discussion (See > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/18/258) that the __GFP flags should be > defined unconditionally. Currently, the only offender is GFP_NOTRACK, > which is conditional to KMEMCHECK. > > This simple patch makes it unconditional. > > Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa > CC: Christoph Lameter > CC: Mel Gorman > CC: Andrew Morton Acked-by: Mel Gorman -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs