From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759135Ab2I1VYc (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:24:32 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:47839 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964838Ab2I1U3i (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:29:38 -0400 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Alan Stern Subject: [ 142/218] PM / Runtime: Fix rpm_resume() return value for power.no_callbacks set Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:15:59 -0700 Message-Id: <20120928201517.784759676@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.1.428.g652398a In-Reply-To: <20120928201501.208384923@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20120928201501.208384923@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.60-2.1.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" commit 7f321c26c04807834fef4c524d2b21573423fc74 upstream. For devices whose power.no_callbacks flag is set, rpm_resume() should return 1 if the device's parent is already active, so that the callers of pm_runtime_get() don't think that they have to wait for the device to resume (asynchronously) in that case (the core won't queue up an asynchronous resume in that case, so there's nothing to wait for anyway). Modify the code accordingly (and make sure that an idle notification will be queued up on success, even if 1 is to be returned). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Acked-by: Alan Stern Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c +++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c @@ -652,6 +652,7 @@ static int rpm_resume(struct device *dev || dev->parent->power.runtime_status == RPM_ACTIVE) { atomic_inc(&dev->parent->power.child_count); spin_unlock(&dev->parent->power.lock); + retval = 1; goto no_callback; /* Assume success. */ } spin_unlock(&dev->parent->power.lock); @@ -735,7 +736,7 @@ static int rpm_resume(struct device *dev } wake_up_all(&dev->power.wait_queue); - if (!retval) + if (retval >= 0) rpm_idle(dev, RPM_ASYNC); out: