From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751442Ab2I3NVE (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:21:04 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:56878 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751148Ab2I3NVB (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:21:01 -0400 Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:20:55 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Daniel Santos Cc: LKML , Andi Kleen , Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , Christopher Li , David Daney , David Howells , Joe Perches , Konstantin Khlebnikov , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, Michel Lespinasse , Paul Gortmaker , Pavel Pisa , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/10] compiler-gcc.h: Add gcc-recommended GCC_VERSION macro Message-ID: <20120930132055.GA15400@liondog.tnic> Mail-Followup-To: Borislav Petkov , Daniel Santos , LKML , Andi Kleen , Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , Christopher Li , David Daney , David Howells , Joe Perches , Konstantin Khlebnikov , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, Michel Lespinasse , Paul Gortmaker , Pavel Pisa , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt References: <1348874411-28288-1-git-send-email-daniel.santos@pobox.com> <1348874411-28288-4-git-send-email-daniel.santos@pobox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1348874411-28288-4-git-send-email-daniel.santos@pobox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 06:20:04PM -0500, Daniel Santos wrote: > Throughout compiler*.h, many version checks are made. These can be > simplified by using the macro that gcc's documentation recommends. > However, my primary reason for adding this is that I need bug-check > macros that are enabled at certain gcc versions and it's cleaner to use > this macro than the tradition method: > > if __GNUC__ > 4 || (__GNUC__ == 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ => 2) > > If you add patch level, it gets this ugly: > > if __GNUC__ > 4 || (__GNUC__ == 4 && (__GNUC_MINOR__ > 2 || \ > __GNUC_MINOR__ == 2 __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ >= 1)) > > As opposed to: > > if GCC_VERSION >= 40201 > > While having separate headers for gcc 3 & 4 eliminates some of this > verbosity, they can still be cleaned up by this. Yes, very fine readability improvement. Acked-by: Borislav Petkov -- Regards/Gruss, Boris.