From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751281Ab2I3OcT (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2012 10:32:19 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:42556 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751042Ab2I3OcH (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2012 10:32:07 -0400 Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 07:32:01 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Andreas Sturmlechner Cc: Daniel Vetter , Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski , stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression Message-ID: <20120930143201.GA22107@kroah.com> References: <2372445.fuIXicT4H0@tux200s> <20120928160656.GE2625@kroah.com> <12610424.iJ3m5UY2ZS@tux200s> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <12610424.iJ3m5UY2ZS@tux200s> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 01:15:38PM +0200, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > > Ok, now reverted, thanks. > > > > greg k-h > > The same patch also breaks 3.0 for me. A 3.0.42 image with the patch > reverted was fine, I checked with several restarts. > > Sort of confirms there is something in >=3.5 that makes this thing work. Ok, Daniel, should I also revert this on 3.0.y? thanks, greg k-h