public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] uprobes: Do not delete uprobe if uprobe_unregister() fails
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 21:42:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120930194204.GA11326@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120930194119.GA11278@redhat.com>

delete_uprobe() must not be called if register_for_each_vma(false)
fails to remove all breakpoints, __uprobe_unregister() is correct.
The problem is that register_for_each_vma(false) always returns 0
and thus this logic does not work.

1. Change verify_opcode() to return 0 rather than -EINVAL when
   unregister detects the !is_swbp insn, we can treat this case
   as success and currently unregister paths ignore the error
   code anyway.

2. Change remove_breakpoint() to propagate the error code from
   write_opcode().

3. Change register_for_each_vma(is_register => false) to remove
   as much breakpoints as possible but return non-zero if
   remove_breakpoint() fails at least once.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/events/uprobes.c |   12 ++++++------
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 3ec114c..6058231 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static int verify_opcode(struct page *page, unsigned long vaddr, uprobe_opcode_t
 			return 0;
 	} else {
 		if (!is_swbp)		/* unregister: was it changed by us? */
-			return -EINVAL;
+			return 0;
 	}
 
 	return 1;
@@ -616,15 +616,15 @@ install_breakpoint(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void
+static int
 remove_breakpoint(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr)
 {
 	/* can happen if uprobe_register() fails */
 	if (!test_bit(MMF_HAS_UPROBES, &mm->flags))
-		return;
+		return 0;
 
 	set_bit(MMF_RECALC_UPROBES, &mm->flags);
-	set_orig_insn(&uprobe->arch, mm, vaddr);
+	return set_orig_insn(&uprobe->arch, mm, vaddr);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ static int register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, bool is_register)
 		struct mm_struct *mm = info->mm;
 		struct vm_area_struct *vma;
 
-		if (err)
+		if (err && is_register)
 			goto free;
 
 		down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
@@ -756,7 +756,7 @@ static int register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, bool is_register)
 		if (is_register)
 			err = install_breakpoint(uprobe, mm, vma, info->vaddr);
 		else
-			remove_breakpoint(uprobe, mm, info->vaddr);
+			err |= remove_breakpoint(uprobe, mm, info->vaddr);
 
  unlock:
 		up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
-- 
1.5.5.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-30 19:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-30 19:41 [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: register/unregister bugfixes Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-30 19:41 ` [PATCH 1/7] uprobes/x86: Only rep+nop can be emulated correctly Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06  7:20   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` [PATCH 2/7] uprobes: Don't return success if alloc_uprobe() fails Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06  7:25   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-10-06  8:48   ` [PATCH 3/7] uprobes: Do not delete uprobe if uprobe_unregister() fails Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` [PATCH 4/7] uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs unregister() + register() race Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-02 18:42   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06  9:33   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-06 17:25     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 17:37       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-06 18:53         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-07  7:12           ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` [PATCH 5/7] uprobes: Introduce uprobe_copy_insn() Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06  9:45   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-06 17:10     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 17:38       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-06 18:59         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-07  7:14           ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` [PATCH 6/7] uprobes: Fix uprobe_copy_insn() race with itself Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06  9:52   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` [PATCH 7/7] uprobes: Fix the racy uprobe->flags manipulation Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-04  8:57   ` Anton Arapov
2012-10-06  9:54   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:44 ` [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: register/unregister bugfixes Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-01 12:55   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-01 14:03     ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120930194204.GA11326@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=anton@redhat.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox