From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] uprobes: Fix the racy uprobe->flags manipulation
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 21:42:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120930194227.GA11350@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120930194119.GA11278@redhat.com>
Multiple threads can manipulate uprobe->flags, this is obviously
unsafe. For example mmap can set UPROBE_COPY_INSN while register
tries to set UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER, the latter can also race with
can_skip_sstep() which clears UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP.
Change this code to use bitops.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 8410388..3d8c815 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -79,11 +79,11 @@ static struct mutex uprobes_mmap_mutex[UPROBES_HASH_SZ];
static atomic_t uprobe_events = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
/* Have a copy of original instruction */
-#define UPROBE_COPY_INSN 0x1
+#define UPROBE_COPY_INSN 0
/* Dont run handlers when first register/ last unregister in progress*/
-#define UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER 0x2
+#define UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER 1
/* Can skip singlestep */
-#define UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP 0x4
+#define UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP 2
struct uprobe {
struct rb_node rb_node; /* node in the rb tree */
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ struct uprobe {
struct uprobe_consumer *consumers;
struct inode *inode; /* Also hold a ref to inode */
loff_t offset;
- int flags;
+ unsigned long flags;
struct arch_uprobe arch;
};
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ static struct uprobe *insert_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe)
spin_unlock(&uprobes_treelock);
/* For now assume that the instruction need not be single-stepped */
- uprobe->flags |= UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP;
+ __set_bit(UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP, &uprobe->flags);
return u;
}
@@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ static void handler_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct uprobe_consumer *uc;
- if (!(uprobe->flags & UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER))
+ if (!test_bit(UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER, &uprobe->flags))
return;
down_read(&uprobe->consumer_rwsem);
@@ -577,11 +577,11 @@ static int uprobe_copy_insn(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct file *file,
{
int ret = 0;
- if (uprobe->flags & UPROBE_COPY_INSN)
+ if (test_bit(UPROBE_COPY_INSN, &uprobe->flags))
return ret;
mutex_lock(&uprobe->copy_mutex);
- if (uprobe->flags & UPROBE_COPY_INSN)
+ if (test_bit(UPROBE_COPY_INSN, &uprobe->flags))
goto out;
ret = copy_insn(uprobe, file);
@@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ static int uprobe_copy_insn(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct file *file,
UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE > PAGE_SIZE);
smp_wmb(); /* pairs with rmb() in find_active_uprobe() */
- uprobe->flags |= UPROBE_COPY_INSN;
+ set_bit(UPROBE_COPY_INSN, &uprobe->flags);
ret = 0;
out:
mutex_unlock(&uprobe->copy_mutex);
@@ -852,7 +852,7 @@ int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *
uprobe->consumers = NULL;
__uprobe_unregister(uprobe);
} else {
- uprobe->flags |= UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER;
+ set_bit(UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER, &uprobe->flags);
}
}
@@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ void uprobe_unregister(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consume
if (consumer_del(uprobe, uc)) {
if (!uprobe->consumers) {
__uprobe_unregister(uprobe);
- uprobe->flags &= ~UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER;
+ clear_bit(UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER, &uprobe->flags);
}
}
@@ -1346,10 +1346,10 @@ bool uprobe_deny_signal(void)
*/
static bool can_skip_sstep(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- if (uprobe->flags & UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP) {
+ if (test_bit(UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP, &uprobe->flags)) {
if (arch_uprobe_skip_sstep(&uprobe->arch, regs))
return true;
- uprobe->flags &= ~UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP;
+ clear_bit(UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP, &uprobe->flags);
}
return false;
}
@@ -1428,7 +1428,7 @@ static struct uprobe *find_active_uprobe(unsigned long bp_vaddr, int *is_swbp)
* new and not-yet-analyzed uprobe at the same address, restart.
*/
smp_rmb(); /* pairs with wmb() in install_breakpoint() */
- if (uprobe && unlikely(!(uprobe->flags & UPROBE_COPY_INSN))) {
+ if (uprobe && unlikely(!test_bit(UPROBE_COPY_INSN, &uprobe->flags))) {
uprobe = NULL;
*is_swbp = 0;
}
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-30 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-30 19:41 [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: register/unregister bugfixes Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-30 19:41 ` [PATCH 1/7] uprobes/x86: Only rep+nop can be emulated correctly Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 7:20 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` [PATCH 2/7] uprobes: Don't return success if alloc_uprobe() fails Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 7:25 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` [PATCH 3/7] uprobes: Do not delete uprobe if uprobe_unregister() fails Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 8:48 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` [PATCH 4/7] uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs unregister() + register() race Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-02 18:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 9:33 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-06 17:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 17:37 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-06 18:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-07 7:12 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` [PATCH 5/7] uprobes: Introduce uprobe_copy_insn() Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 9:45 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-06 17:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 17:38 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-06 18:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-07 7:14 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` [PATCH 6/7] uprobes: Fix uprobe_copy_insn() race with itself Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 9:52 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-10-04 8:57 ` [PATCH 7/7] uprobes: Fix the racy uprobe->flags manipulation Anton Arapov
2012-10-06 9:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:44 ` [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: register/unregister bugfixes Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-01 12:55 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-01 14:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120930194227.GA11350@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox