From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752703Ab2JAOCp (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2012 10:02:45 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:20666 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751989Ab2JAOCf (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2012 10:02:35 -0400 Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 16:03:27 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Srikar Dronamraju Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Anton Arapov , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: register/unregister bugfixes Message-ID: <20121001140327.GA2389@redhat.com> References: <20120930194119.GA11278@redhat.com> <20120930194438.GA11222@redhat.com> <20121001125552.GA27781@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121001125552.GA27781@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/01, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > > This is on top of "[PATCH 0/3] uprobes: mprotect fixes" series, > > which is still waiting for review... > > > > Did you mean [PATCH 0/4] uprobes: remove is_swbp_at_addr() from > register/unregister? Yes, sorry for confusion, > I have already reviewed and acked "[PATCH 0/3] uprobes: mprotect fixes" > series". Yes, and I already added your acks, thanks. > Got distracted by the register/unregister bug that we were discussing > offline. Yes. 2-6 try to fix the bugs I found by the code inspection, but I do not think they can fix that bug, I guess there is yet another problem we need to fix. Oleg.