From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754638Ab2JDBr4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2012 21:47:56 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:35346 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751293Ab2JDBry (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2012 21:47:54 -0400 Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 21:47:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20121003.214750.2022020970468412510.davem@davemloft.net> To: sfr@canb.auug.org.au Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vipul@chelsio.com, jay@chelsio.com Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20121004110615.3fda3c25735284c776106d7d@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20121004101833.019598b7e474c7b74e67ff20@canb.auug.org.au> <20121003.205053.1711360628623711137.davem@davemloft.net> <20121004110615.3fda3c25735284c776106d7d@canb.auug.org.au> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Stephen Rothwell Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 11:06:15 +1000 > Actually, for me it is. I have a script that does the "use yesterday's > version" for me. To fix (even a one liner) means bringing up an editor, > commiting, creating the patch and then recommiting it (an implementation > detail) and recording that I need to keep (automatically) applying the > patch in case the maintainer doesn't react quickly. Ok, fair enough. I'll try to look into making x86 barf when a vmalloc.h include is missing.