From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965059Ab2JCRpw (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2012 13:45:52 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]:35878 "EHLO 1wt.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754397Ab2JCRpv (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2012 13:45:51 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 19:45:43 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Ben Hutchings Cc: John Stultz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Sasha Levin , Thomas Gleixner , Prarit Bhargava Subject: Re: [ 008/180] 2.6.32.x: ntp: Fix leap-second hrtimer livelock Message-ID: <20121003174543.GI3889@1wt.eu> References: <20121001225157.951753597@1wt.eu> <1349275814.16173.13.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> <20121003160151.GE3889@1wt.eu> <506C6F59.8050403@linaro.org> <20121003173448.GF32217@decadent.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121003173448.GF32217@decadent.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:34:48PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 10:01:13AM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > > On 10/03/2012 09:01 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > >Hi Ben, > > > > > >On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 03:50:14PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > >>On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 00:52 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > >>>2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > >>[...] > > >> > > >>No objection, but please remove the '2.6.32.x: ' prefix from the subject > > >>before committing this and the other ntp/timekeeping/hrtimer fixes. > > >Good point. Initially John used this as a differenciator when sending to > > >stable@ but I directly applied the mbox without fixing the subject, which > > >isn't a good thing. > > Do let me know if there's a better way for me to send them (and keep > > the versions straight) without creating more work for you. > > I can't speak for Willy but I would prefer something like > '[PATCH 3.2.y]' in the subject. 'git am' or any other patch > import script should strip that out. I didn't think about this, it's another possibility indeed. Willy