linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL invisible and default
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 23:31:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121003213117.GD637@somewhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jJhEpdwCqYc0hWs504snMZg9FMygUjLwRUSyaKGAfXb5Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:43:32AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> I would expect a simple addition of "this is dangerous/buggy" to the
> description and "default n" is likely the way to go for that kind of
> thing.

Agreed.

> I think the history of CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL has proven there
> isn't a sensible way to create a global flag for this kind of thing.
> To paraphrase Serge: my experimental options are not your experimental
> options.
> For example, some of the things that already had the experimental
> config removed, they left the "(EXPERIMENTAL)" in their config title.

Right.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-03 21:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-02 19:50 [PATCH] make CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL invisible and default Kees Cook
2012-10-02 21:40 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2012-10-03 13:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-03 16:15   ` Kees Cook
2012-10-03 16:43     ` Josh Boyer
2012-10-03 16:16   ` Serge Hallyn
2012-10-03 16:17   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-10-03 16:47     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-03 17:21       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-10-03 17:46         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-10-03 18:23           ` Josh Boyer
2012-10-03 19:36           ` Dave Jones
2012-10-03 20:05             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-03 21:43             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-10-04 14:31               ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-03 17:46         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-03 18:02           ` Serge Hallyn
2012-10-03 18:43       ` Kees Cook
2012-10-03 19:07         ` david
2012-10-03 20:03         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-03 22:23           ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-10-04  0:11             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-04  1:55           ` Matthew Garrett
2012-10-04 14:31             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-05 16:46               ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-06 16:10                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-10-07  1:44                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-07  2:33                     ` Dave Airlie
2012-10-07 16:30                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-07 20:18                         ` Dave Jones
2012-10-08  1:04                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-08 22:07                             ` Kees Cook
2012-10-08 22:29                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-08 22:37                                 ` Kees Cook
2012-10-08 22:40                                   ` Kees Cook
2012-10-08 22:59                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-08 23:23                                       ` Kees Cook
2012-10-03 21:31         ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2012-10-08 22:08     ` Kees Cook
2012-10-08 23:53       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-10-09  0:46         ` Kees Cook
2012-10-09  1:20           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-10-09  1:26           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-09  1:57             ` Kees Cook
2012-10-09  2:47               ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-09  6:01                 ` Kees Cook
2012-12-16  4:29     ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-16 16:19       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-03 23:29 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-10-03 23:33   ` Kees Cook
2012-10-03 23:37     ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121003213117.GD637@somewhere \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).