From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RCU_USER_QS traces.
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:36:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121005123609.GA13172@somewhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121004144106.GB11191@redhat.com>
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 10:41:06AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > We have CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS that is a specific case. It's an intermediate state
> > before we implement a true CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL. But the option is useless on its
> > own for users. Worse, it introduces a real overhead. OTOH we want it to be upstream
> > to make the development of full tickless feature more incremental.
>
> I couldn't resist trying it.. Did these get reported yet ?
Hi Dave,
Thanks for this report. I need to find the source of the issue.
If you don't mind, could you please apply the following patch? You'll also
need to enable:
- CONFIG_EVENT_TRACING and CONFIG_RCU_TRACE
And you also need this boot parameter:
- trace_event=rcu_dyntick
Thanks a lot!
---
>From 824f2ef855597d6dd263bb363727e4585db88ca3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 17:30:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] rcu: Dump rcu traces and stacktraces on dynticks warnings
Temp patch for debugging.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
---
kernel/rcutree.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 4fb2376..1bc96fd 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -59,6 +59,12 @@
#include "rcu.h"
+#define trace_rcu_dyntick_stacktrace(...) { \
+ trace_rcu_dyntick(__VA_ARGS__); \
+ trace_dump_stack();\
+}
+
+
/* Data structures. */
static struct lock_class_key rcu_node_class[RCU_NUM_LVLS];
@@ -334,11 +340,11 @@ static struct rcu_node *rcu_get_root(struct rcu_state *rsp)
static void rcu_eqs_enter_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval,
bool user)
{
- trace_rcu_dyntick("Start", oldval, 0);
+ trace_rcu_dyntick_stacktrace("Start", oldval, 0);
if (!user && !is_idle_task(current)) {
struct task_struct *idle = idle_task(smp_processor_id());
- trace_rcu_dyntick("Error on entry: not idle task", oldval, 0);
+ trace_rcu_dyntick_stacktrace("Error on entry: not idle task", oldval, 0);
ftrace_dump(DUMP_ORIG);
WARN_ONCE(1, "Current pid: %d comm: %s / Idle pid: %d comm: %s",
current->pid, current->comm,
@@ -349,7 +355,8 @@ static void rcu_eqs_enter_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval,
smp_mb__before_atomic_inc(); /* See above. */
atomic_inc(&rdtp->dynticks);
smp_mb__after_atomic_inc(); /* Force ordering with next sojourn. */
- WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1))
+ ftrace_dump(DUMP_ORIG);
/*
* It is illegal to enter an extended quiescent state while
@@ -374,7 +381,8 @@ static void rcu_eqs_enter(bool user)
rdtp = &__get_cpu_var(rcu_dynticks);
oldval = rdtp->dynticks_nesting;
- WARN_ON_ONCE((oldval & DYNTICK_TASK_NEST_MASK) == 0);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE((oldval & DYNTICK_TASK_NEST_MASK) == 0))
+ ftrace_dump(DUMP_ORIG);
if ((oldval & DYNTICK_TASK_NEST_MASK) == DYNTICK_TASK_NEST_VALUE)
rdtp->dynticks_nesting = 0;
else
@@ -489,9 +497,9 @@ void rcu_irq_exit(void)
oldval = rdtp->dynticks_nesting;
rdtp->dynticks_nesting--;
WARN_ON_ONCE(rdtp->dynticks_nesting < 0);
- if (rdtp->dynticks_nesting)
- trace_rcu_dyntick("--=", oldval, rdtp->dynticks_nesting);
- else
+ if (rdtp->dynticks_nesting) {
+ trace_rcu_dyntick_stacktrace("--=", oldval, rdtp->dynticks_nesting);
+ } else
rcu_eqs_enter_common(rdtp, oldval, true);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
@@ -510,13 +518,14 @@ static void rcu_eqs_exit_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval,
atomic_inc(&rdtp->dynticks);
/* CPUs seeing atomic_inc() must see later RCU read-side crit sects */
smp_mb__after_atomic_inc(); /* See above. */
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!(atomic_read(&rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1));
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(atomic_read(&rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1)))
+ ftrace_dump(DUMP_ORIG);
rcu_cleanup_after_idle(smp_processor_id());
- trace_rcu_dyntick("End", oldval, rdtp->dynticks_nesting);
+ trace_rcu_dyntick_stacktrace("End", oldval, rdtp->dynticks_nesting);
if (!user && !is_idle_task(current)) {
struct task_struct *idle = idle_task(smp_processor_id());
- trace_rcu_dyntick("Error on exit: not idle task",
+ trace_rcu_dyntick_stacktrace("Error on exit: not idle task",
oldval, rdtp->dynticks_nesting);
ftrace_dump(DUMP_ORIG);
WARN_ONCE(1, "Current pid: %d comm: %s / Idle pid: %d comm: %s",
@@ -536,7 +545,8 @@ static void rcu_eqs_exit(bool user)
rdtp = &__get_cpu_var(rcu_dynticks);
oldval = rdtp->dynticks_nesting;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(oldval < 0);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(oldval < 0))
+ ftrace_dump(DUMP_ORIG);
if (oldval & DYNTICK_TASK_NEST_MASK)
rdtp->dynticks_nesting += DYNTICK_TASK_NEST_VALUE;
else
@@ -650,9 +660,9 @@ void rcu_irq_enter(void)
oldval = rdtp->dynticks_nesting;
rdtp->dynticks_nesting++;
WARN_ON_ONCE(rdtp->dynticks_nesting == 0);
- if (oldval)
- trace_rcu_dyntick("++=", oldval, rdtp->dynticks_nesting);
- else
+ if (oldval) {
+ trace_rcu_dyntick_stacktrace("++=", oldval, rdtp->dynticks_nesting);
+ } else
rcu_eqs_exit_common(rdtp, oldval, true);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-05 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-04 14:41 RCU_USER_QS traces Dave Jones
2012-10-04 15:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-05 12:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2012-10-05 20:00 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121005123609.GA13172@somewhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox