From: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: 김재극 <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, "'Theodore Ts'o'" <tytso@mit.edu>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, chur.lee@samsung.com,
cm224.lee@samsung.com, jooyoung.hwang@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/16] f2fs: add on-disk layout
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 19:46:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201210051946.21451.Martin@lichtvoll.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000901cda2f0$7d773eb0$7865bc10$%kim@samsung.com>
Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012 schrieb 김재극:
> This adds a header file describing the on-disk layout of f2fs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Changman Lee <cm224.lee@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chul Lee <chur.lee@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
> ---
> include/linux/f2fs_fs.h | 359 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 359 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/f2fs_fs.h
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/f2fs_fs.h b/include/linux/f2fs_fs.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b17eeec
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/f2fs_fs.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,359 @@
> +/**
> + * include/linux/f2fs_fs.h
[…]
> +/*
> + * For superblock
> + */
> +struct f2fs_super_block {
> + __le32 magic; /* Magic Number */
> + __le16 major_ver; /* Major Version */
> + __le16 minor_ver; /* Minor Version */
> + __le32 log_sectorsize; /* log2 (Sector size in bytes) */
> + __le32 log_sectors_per_block; /* log2 (Number of sectors per block */
> + __le32 log_blocksize; /* log2 (Block size in bytes) */
> + __le32 log_blocks_per_seg; /* log2 (Number of blocks per segment) */
> + __le32 log_segs_per_sec; /* log2 (Number of segments per section) */
> + __le32 secs_per_zone; /* Number of sections per zone */
> + __le32 checksum_offset; /* Checksum position in this super block */
> + __le64 block_count; /* Total number of blocks */
> + __le32 section_count; /* Total number of sections */
> + __le32 segment_count; /* Total number of segments */
> + __le32 segment_count_ckpt; /* Total number of segments
> + in Checkpoint area */
> + __le32 segment_count_sit; /* Total number of segments
> + in Segment information table */
> + __le32 segment_count_nat; /* Total number of segments
> + in Node address table */
> + /*Total number of segments in Segment summary area */
> + __le32 segment_count_ssa;
> + /* Total number of segments in Main area */
> + __le32 segment_count_main;
> + __le32 failure_safe_block_distance;
> + __le64 segment0_blkaddr; /* Start block address of Segment 0 */
> + __le64 start_segment_checkpoint; /* Start block address of ckpt */
> + __le64 sit_blkaddr; /* Start block address of SIT */
> + __le64 nat_blkaddr; /* Start block address of NAT */
> + __le64 ssa_blkaddr; /* Start block address of SSA */
> + __le64 main_blkaddr; /* Start block address of Main area */
> + __le32 root_ino; /* Root directory inode number */
> + __le32 node_ino; /* node inode number */
> + __le32 meta_ino; /* meta inode number */
> + __le32 volume_serial_number; /* VSN is optional field */
> + __le16 volume_name[8]; /* Volume Name. 8 unicode characters */
> +} __packed;
Any reason why volume label is that short?
If superblock can occupy up to 4096 bytes, i.e. a block, I think a bit
more space for volume label would fit in there. I count 128 bytes up
to volume_name. Do other structures need to fit in superblock as well?
I believe users easily can hit a limit of 8 unicode characters even for
USB sticks and SD cards.
Nice to see a flash friendly filesystem which seems to take lots of the
stuff in account I read at Linaro website about flash devices.
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-05 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-05 11:56 [PATCH 02/16] f2fs: add on-disk layout 김재극
2012-10-05 17:46 ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
2012-10-06 18:25 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2012-10-05 17:54 ` Dan Luedtke
2012-10-05 21:09 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-10-06 18:19 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2012-10-06 22:21 ` David Sterba
2012-10-09 5:27 ` Chul Lee
2012-10-07 6:42 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-10-10 5:52 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2012-10-12 21:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-13 11:39 ` Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201210051946.21451.Martin@lichtvoll.de \
--to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=chur.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=cm224.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=jooyoung.hwang@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox