From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@computer.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
acme@redhat.com, jolsa@redhat.com, eranian@google.com,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Tie lose "perf, tools" ends in Haswell PMU patchkit
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 19:34:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121006173429.GR16230@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <507046D0.8090408@computer.org>
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 04:57:20PM +0200, Jan Ceuleers wrote:
> On 10/03/2012 11:22 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > This fixes some left over issues in my Haswell PMU patchkit yesterday:
> > Ideally applied on top, although there should be no direct dependencies.
> >
> > - Now the kernel supplied sysfs aliases can be directly used for cpu.
> > This means I can use "tx-aborts" instead of "cpu/tx-aborts/
> > - List the kernel events
> > - Support using the same names as generic events for kernel events.
> > This allows to use cpu/instructions,intx=1/ which was not possible
> > before because instructions clashed with the generic name.
>
> I (i.e. me, moi) received only patches 2/3 and 3/3. Is there a patch 1/3?
Yes there was. Not sure what happened. But these three patches had some bugs,
I'll post an updated version folded into the original Haswell patchkit
after the merge window closes. Right now people seem to be too busy
to review it.
Let me know if you want to test something earlier.
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-06 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-03 21:22 Tie lose "perf, tools" ends in Haswell PMU patchkit Andi Kleen
2012-10-03 21:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf, tools: Support generic events as pmu event names Andi Kleen
2012-10-03 21:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf, tools: Default to cpu// for events Andi Kleen
2012-10-03 21:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf, tools: List kernel supplied event aliases in perf list Andi Kleen
2012-10-06 14:57 ` Tie lose "perf, tools" ends in Haswell PMU patchkit Jan Ceuleers
2012-10-06 17:34 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121006173429.GR16230@one.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jan.ceuleers@computer.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox