From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs unregister() + register() race
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 23:07:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121006173719.GA9143@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121006172531.GB9819@redhat.com>
>
> for the future changes... (say, we can remove bp if consumers do not
> want to trace this task). Not sure it makes sense to change it right
> now.
>
> So. Should I leave this patch as is? Or do you want me to move this
> check into handler_chain() and make it return "bool restart"?
Lets keep it as is for now.
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-06 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-30 19:41 [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: register/unregister bugfixes Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-30 19:41 ` [PATCH 1/7] uprobes/x86: Only rep+nop can be emulated correctly Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 7:20 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` [PATCH 2/7] uprobes: Don't return success if alloc_uprobe() fails Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 7:25 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` [PATCH 3/7] uprobes: Do not delete uprobe if uprobe_unregister() fails Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 8:48 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` [PATCH 4/7] uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs unregister() + register() race Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-02 18:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 9:33 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-06 17:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 17:37 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2012-10-06 18:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-07 7:12 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` [PATCH 5/7] uprobes: Introduce uprobe_copy_insn() Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 9:45 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-06 17:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 17:38 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-06 18:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-07 7:14 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` [PATCH 6/7] uprobes: Fix uprobe_copy_insn() race with itself Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 9:52 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` [PATCH 7/7] uprobes: Fix the racy uprobe->flags manipulation Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-04 8:57 ` Anton Arapov
2012-10-06 9:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:44 ` [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: register/unregister bugfixes Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-01 12:55 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-01 14:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121006173719.GA9143@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox